This Article Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 1545968309338190v1 23/9/945    most recent References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Stoykov, M. E. Articles by Corcos, D. M. PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Stoykov, M. E. Articles by Corcos, D. M. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Comparison of Bilateral and Unilateral Training for Upper Extremity Hemiparesis in Stroke

Sensorimotor Performance Program, Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, Department of Kinesiology and Nutrition, the University of Illinois at Chicago, mphillips{at}ric.org

Gwyn N. Lewis, PhD

Sensorimotor Performance Program, Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, Health and Rehabilitation Research Centre, AUT University, Northcote, Auckland, New Zealand

Daniel M. Corcos, PhD

Department of Kinesiology and Nutrition, the University of Illinois at Chicago

Background. Upper extremity hemiparesis is the most common poststroke disability. Longitudinal studies have indicated that 30% to 66% of stroke survivors do not have full arm function 6 months poststroke. One promising treatment approach is bilateral training. To date, no randomized, blinded study of efficacy comparing 2 groups (bilateral training vs unilateral training) using analogous tasks has been performed in chronic stroke survivors with moderate upper extremity impairment. Objective. To compare the effectiveness of bilateral training with unilateral training for individuals with moderate upper limb hemiparesis. The authors hypothesized that bilateral training would be superior to unilateral training in the proximal extremity but not the distal one. Methods. Twenty-four subjects participated in a randomized, single-blind training study. Subjects in the bilateral group (n = 12) practiced bilateral symmetrical activities, whereas the unilateral group (n = 12) performed the same activity with the affected arm only. The activities consisted of reaching-based tasks that were both rhythmic and discrete. The Motor Assessment Scale (MAS), Motor Status Scale (MSS), and muscle strength were used as outcome measures. Assessments were administered at baseline and posttraining by a rater blinded to group assignment. Results. Both groups had significant improvements on the MSS and measures of strength. The bilateral group had significantly greater improvement on the Upper Arm Function scale (a subscale of the MAS-Upper Limb Items). Conclusion. Both bilateral and unilateral training are efficacious for moderately impaired chronic stroke survivors. Bilateral training may be more advantageous for proximal arm function.

Key Words: Stroke • Bilateral • Upper extremity

This version was published on November 1, 2009

Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, Vol. 23, No. 9, 945-953 (2009)
DOI: 10.1177/1545968309338190


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?