SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
1545968309337137v1
23/8/825    most recent
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by De Wit, L.
Right arrow Articles by Lesaffre, E.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by De Wit, L.
Right arrow Articles by Lesaffre, E.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
Medline Plus Health Information
*Stroke
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Use of a Biplot in Studying Outcomes After Stroke

Liesbet De Wit, PT, PhD

Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Kinesiology and Rehabilitation Sciences Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium, Liesbet.Dewit{at}faber.kuleuven.be

Marek Molas, MSc

Department of Biostatistics, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands

Eddy Dejaeger, MD, PhD

University Hospital Pellenberg, Belgium

Willy De Weerdt, PT, PhD

Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Kinesiology and Rehabilitation Sciences Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium

Hilde Feys, PT, PhD

Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Kinesiology and Rehabilitation Sciences Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium

Walter Jenni, MD

Rehaclinic Zurzach, Switzerland

Nadina Lincoln, PhD

Institute of Work, Health and Organisations, University of Nottingham, United Kingdom

Koen Putman, PT, PhD

Department of Medical Sociology and Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Belgium

Wilfried Schupp, MD

Fachklinik Herzogenaurach, Germany

Emmanuel Lesaffre, PhD

I-BioStat, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven and Universiteit Hasselt, Belgium, Department of Biostatistics, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands

Background and purpose. This study aimed to unravel the multidimensional profile of stroke outcomes by investigating the global correlation structure of motor, functional, and emotional problems of patients, as well as their caregivers’ strain, at 6 months after stroke. Potential differential associations based on patients’ level of functioning on admission to the rehabilitation center were analyzed. Methods. Data were collected within the CERISE-study (Collaborative Evaluation of Rehabilitation in Stroke across Europe). Six months after stroke, the Rivermead Motor Assessment (RMA), Extended Activities of Daily Living (EADL), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale—Anxiety (HADS-A) and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale—Depression (HADS-D), EuroQol—Health State (EQ-HS), EuroQol—Visual Analogue Scale (EQ-VAS), and Caregiver Strain Index (CSI) were administered. Patients were classified into 3 categories according to their Barthel Index (BI) score on admission to the rehabilitation center. Principal component analysis was carried out, and a biplot was constructed. Results. Data were available on 510 patients. One cluster was formed by RMA and EADL, and a second one by HADS-A, HADS-D, and EQ-VAS. EQ-HS was situated between these two. CSI formed a third dimension. Patients with low BI scores on admission to the rehabilitation center had higher HADS-A and HADS-D scores 6 months after stroke. High BI scores were associated with large variations in HADS-A and HADS-D scores. Conclusions. This novel biplot strategy for rehabilitation studies revealed 2 clusters: one of motor/functional problems and one of emotional problems. Patients with mild functional deficit measured on admission to the rehabilitation center can suffer from mild to severe anxiety and depression at 6 months poststroke. Screening for emotional disorders in all patients is recommended.

Key Words: Stroke • Outcome • Biplot

This version was published on October 1, 2009

Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, Vol. 23, No. 8, 825-830 (2009)
DOI: 10.1177/1545968309337137


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




Advertisement