SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
1545968308316386v1
22/6/728    most recent
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by MacIntosh, B. J.
Right arrow Articles by Graham, S. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by MacIntosh, B. J.
Right arrow Articles by Graham, S. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Electrodermal Recording and fMRI to Inform Sensorimotor Recovery in Stroke Patients

Bradley J. MacIntosh, PhD

Center for Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Brain, John Radcliffe Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom, bmac{at}fmrib.ox.ac.uk, Imaging Research, Toronto, Canada, Heart and Stroke Foundation Centre for Stroke Recovery

William E. McIlroy, PhD

Graduate Department of Rehabilitation Science University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada, Department of Kinesiology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada, Heart and Stroke Foundation Centre for Stroke Recovery, Toronto, Canada

Richard Mraz

Heart and Stroke Foundation Centre for Stroke Recovery, Toronto, Canada, Imaging Research, Toronto, Canada

W. Richard Staines, PhD

Department of Kinesiology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada, Heart and Stroke Foundation Centre for Stroke Recovery, Toronto, Canada

Sandra E. Black, MD

Graduate Department of Rehabilitation Science University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada, Rotman Research Institute, Baycrest Centre for Geriatric Care Toronto, Canada, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada, Heart and Stroke Foundation Centre for Stroke Recovery

Simon J. Graham, PhD

Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada, Rotman Research Institute, Baycrest Centre for Geriatric Care Toronto, Canada, Imaging Research, Toronto, Canada, Heart and Stroke Foundation Centre for Stroke Recovery, Toronto, Canada

Background. Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) appears to be useful for investigating motor recovery after stroke. Some of the potential confounders of brain activation studies, however, could be mitigated through complementary physiological monitoring. Objective. To investigate a sensorimotor fMRI battery that included simultaneous measurement of electrodermal activity in subjects with hemiparetic stroke to provide a measure related to the sense of effort during motor performance. Methods. Bilateral hand and ankle tasks were performed by 6 patients with stroke (2 subacute, 4 chronic) during imaging with blood oxygen level-dependent (BOLD) fMRI using an event-related design. BOLD percent changes, peak activation, and laterality index values were calculated in the sensorimotor cortex. Electrodermal recordings were made concurrently and used as a regressor. Results. Sensorimotor BOLD time series and percent change values provided evidence of an intact motor network in each of these well-recovered patients. During tasks involving the hemiparetic limb, electrodermal activity changes were variable in amplitude, and electrodermal activity time-series data showed significant correlations with fMRI in 3 of 6 patients. No such correlations were observed for control tasks involving the unaffected lower limb. Conclusions. Electrodermal activity activation maps implicated the contralesional over the ipsilesional hemisphere, supporting the notion that stroke patients may require higher order motor processing to perform simple tasks. Electrodermal activity recordings may be useful as a physiological marker of differences in effort required during movements of a subject's hemiparetic compared with the unaffected limb during fMRI studies.

Key Words: BOLD fMRI • Electrodermal activity • Stroke recovery • Ankle dorsiflexion • Grip • Hemiparesis.

This version was published on November 1, 2008

Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, Vol. 22, No. 6, 728-736 (2008)
DOI: 10.1177/1545968308316386


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




Advertisement