SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
1545968307305522v1
1545968307305522v2
22/2/136    most recent
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Marshall, R. S.
Right arrow Articles by Lazar, R. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Marshall, R. S.
Right arrow Articles by Lazar, R. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Brain Activity Associated With Stimulation Therapy of the Visual Borderzone in Hemianopic Stroke Patients

Randolph S. Marshall, MD

Department of Neurology Columbia University Medical Center, rsm2{at}columbia.edu

John J. Ferrera, MS

Department of Radiology Columbia University Medical Center

Anna Barnes, PhD

Department of Radiology Columbia University Medical Center

Xian Zhang, PhD

Department of Psychology, Columbia University New York, New York

Katherine A. O'Brien

Department of Neurology Columbia University Medical Center

Mohamad Chmayssani, MD

Department of Neurology Columbia University Medical Center

Joy Hirsch, PhD

Department of Radiology Columbia University Medical Center, Department of Psychology, Columbia University New York, New York

Ronald M. Lazar, PhD

Department of Neurology Columbia University Medical Center

Background and objective. Visual restoration therapy is a home-based treatment program intended to expand visual fields of hemianopic patients through repetitive stimulation of the borderzone adjacent to the blind field. We hypothesized that the training itself would induce visual field location-specific changes in the brain's response to stimuli, a phenomenon demonstrated in animal experiments but never in humans with brain injury. Methods. Six chronic right hemianopic patients underwent functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI)—responding to stimuli in the trained visual borderzone versus the nontrained seeing field before and after 1 month of visual restoration therapy. Spatially normalized fMRI time-series data were analyzed in a fixed-effects group analysis comparing blood oxygen level dependent (BOLD) activity in the borderzone versus seeing location at baseline and at 1 month. Percent BOLD change was measured to determine each condition's contribution to the time-by-condition interaction. Results. There was a significant time by condition interaction manifested as increased BOLD activity for borderzone detection relative to seeing detection after the first month of therapy, which correlated with a relative improvement in response times in the borderzone location out-of-scanner. The right inferior and lateral temporal, right dorsolateral frontal, bilateral anterior cingulate, and bilateral basal ganglia showed the greatest response. Conclusion. Visual restoration therapy appears to induce an alteration in brain activity associated with a shift of attention from the nontrained seeing field to the trained borderzone. The effect appears to be mediated by the anterior cingulate and dorsolateral frontal cortex in conjunction with other higher order visual areas in the occipitotemporal and middle temporal regions. Demonstration of a visual field—specific training effect on brain activity provides an important starting point for understanding the potential for visual therapy in hemianopia.

Key Words: Visual restoration therapy • Hemianopia • fMRI • Visual training • Brain plasticity.

This version was published on April 1, 2008

Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, Vol. 22, No. 2, 136-144 (2008)
DOI: 10.1177/1545968307305522


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Neurorehabil Neural RepairHome page
S. Jobke, E. Kasten, and B. A. Sabel
Vision Restoration Through Extrastriate Stimulation in Patients With Visual Field Defects: A Double-Blind and Randomized Experimental Study
Neurorehabil Neural Repair, March 1, 2009; 23(3): 246 - 255.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Advertisement