SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair
This Article
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
1545968307300523v1
1545968307300523v2
21/5/455    most recent
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Thaut, M.H.
Right arrow Articles by Fetter, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Thaut, M.H.
Right arrow Articles by Fetter, M.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
Medline Plus Health Information
*Stroke
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Rhythmic Auditor y Stimulation Improves Gait More Than NDT/Bobath Training in Near-Ambulatory Patients Early Poststroke: A Single-Blind, Randomized Trial

M.H. Thaut, PhD

Molecular, Cellular, and Integrative Neuroscience Programs, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, michael.thaut{at}colostate.edu

A.K. Leins, PhD

University of Applied Sciences Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany

R.R. Rice, MS

Poudre Valley Hospital, Fort Collins, CO

H. Argstatter, MA

University of Applied Sciences Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany

G.P. Kenyon, MS

Colorado State University, Fort Collins

G.C. McIntosh, MD

Poudre Valley Hospital, Fort Collins, CO

H.V. Bolay, PhD

University of Applied Sciences Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany

M. Fetter, MD

SRH-Hospitals Karlsbad-Langensteinbach, Karlsbad, Germany

Objectives. The effectiveness of 2 different types of gait training in stroke rehabilitation, rhythmic auditory stimulation (RAS) versus neurodevelopmental therapy (NDT)/Bobath– based training, was compared in 2 groups of hemiparetic stroke patients over a 3-week period of daily training (RAS group, n = 43; NDT/Bobath group =35). Methods. Mean entry date into the study was 21.3 days poststroke for the RAS group and 22.3 days for the control group. Patients entered the study as soon as they were able to complete 5 stride cycles with handheld assistance. Patients were closely equated by age, gender, and lesion site. Motor function in both groups was pre-assessed by the Barthel Index and the Fugl-Meyer Scales. Results. Pre- to posttest measures showed a significant improvement in the RAS group for velocity (P = .006), stride length (P = .0001), cadence (P = .0001) and symmetry (P = .0049) over the NDT/Bobath group. Effect sizes for RAS over NDT/Bobath training were 13.1 m/min for velocity, 0.18 m for stride length, and 19 steps/min for cadence. Conclusions. The data show that after 3 weeks of gait training, RAS is an effective therapeutic method to enhance gait training in hemiparetic stroke rehabilitation. Gains were significantly higher for RAS compared to NDT/Bobath training.

Key Words: Gait rehabilitation • Stroke • Rhythmic auditory stimulation

This version was published on October 1, 2007

Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, Vol. 21, No. 5, 455-459 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/1545968307300523


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Neurorehabil Neural RepairHome page
M. E. Stoykov, G. N. Lewis, and D. M. Corcos
Comparison of Bilateral and Unilateral Training for Upper Extremity Hemiparesis in Stroke
Neurorehabil Neural Repair, November 1, 2009; 23(9): 945 - 953.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Neurorehabil Neural RepairHome page
M. Roerdink, C. J. C. Lamoth, J. van Kordelaar, P. Elich, M. Konijnenbelt, G. Kwakkel, and P. J. Beek
Rhythm Perturbations in Acoustically Paced Treadmill Walking After Stroke
Neurorehabil Neural Repair, September 1, 2009; 23(7): 668 - 678.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
R. Stock and P. J. Mork
The effect of an intensive exercise programme on leg function in chronic stroke patients: a pilot study with one-year follow-up
Clinical Rehabilitation, September 1, 2009; 23(9): 790 - 799.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
B. J. Kollen, S. Lennon, B. Lyons, L. Wheatley-Smith, M. Scheper, J. H. Buurke, J. Halfens, A. C.H. Geurts, and G. Kwakkel
The Effectiveness of the Bobath Concept in Stroke Rehabilitation: What is the Evidence?
Stroke, April 1, 2009; 40(4): e89 - e97.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Neurorehabil Neural RepairHome page
R. Dickstein
Rehabilitation of Gait Speed After Stroke: A Critical Review of Intervention Approaches
Neurorehabil Neural Repair, November 1, 2008; 22(6): 649 - 660.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Advertisement