This Article Full Text (OnlineFirst PDF) All Versions of this Article: 1545968308329922v1 23/6/595    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Page, S. J. Articles by Levine, P. G. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Page, S. J. Articles by Levine, P. G. Pubmed/NCBI databases Medline Plus Health Information Stroke Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Activity-Based Electrical Stimulation Training in a Stroke Patient With Minimal Movement in the Paretic Upper Extremity

^* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: Stephen.Page{at}uc.edu.

	Abstract

Background. Existing task-specific practice interventions do not increase movement in stroke patients exhibiting minimal distal movement in the paretic upper extremity. Although often used, an important limitation of conventional electrical stimulation is that it does not involve task-specific practice. Objective. To determine the impact of an activity-specific electrical stimulation program on paretic limb impairment, functional limitation, and ability to perform valued activities in a subacute stroke patient exhibiting minimal paretic wrist and hand movement. Method. A female subject exhibiting trace paretic hand and finger movement was administered, 9 months after stroke, the upper extremity section of the Fugl-Meyer Impairment Scale (FM), the Action Research Arm Test (ARAT), and the Arm Motor Ability Test (AMAT). She then engaged in paretic upper extremity, task-specific training incorporating an electrical stimulation neuroprosthesis. Training occurred 3 hours per day, 5 days per week for 3 weeks. The FM, ARAT, and AMAT were again administered. Results. After intervention, she exhibited reduced impairment (evidenced by an FM score change of 22 to 29), decreased functional limitation (evidenced by an ARAT score change of 4 to 10), and increased ability and speed in performing valued AMAT activities. She also reported using the paretic hand and fingers more and new abilities to perform valued activities such as playing piano. Conclusion. Although conventional paretic upper extremity training strategies are ineffective in patients at this level, electrical stimulation training incorporating a neuroprosthesis appears promising.

First published on December 17, 2008, doi:10.1177/1545968308329922

Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair 2009;23:595.

A more recent version of this article appeared on July 1, 2009


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?