|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
What Do Motor "Recovery" and "Compensation" Mean in Patients Following Stroke?
Mindy F. Levin, PhD, PT*,
Jeffrey A. Kleim, PhD,
and
Steven L. Wolf, PhD, PT, FAPTA, FAHA
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: mindy.levin{at}mcgill.ca.
 |
Abstract |
|---|
There is a lack of consistency among researchers and clinicians in the use of terminology that describes changes in motor ability following neurological injury. Specifically, the terms and definitions of motor compensation and motor recovery have been used in different ways, which is a potential barrier to interdisciplinary communication. This Point of View describes the problem and offers a solution in the form of definitions of compensation and recovery at the neuronal, motor performance, and functional levels within the framework of the International Classification of Functioning model.
First published on December 31, 2008, doi:10.1177/1545968308328727
Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair 2009;23:313.
A more recent version of this article appeared on May 1, 2009

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. H. Dobkin
Collaborative Models for Translational Neuroscience and Rehabilitation Research
Neurorehabil Neural Repair,
September 1, 2009;
23(7):
633 - 640.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. L. Behrman
Invited Commentary
Physical Therapy,
June 1, 2009;
89(6):
612 - 615.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. E. Musselman, K. Fouad, J. E. Misiaszek, and J. F. Yang
Author Response
Physical Therapy,
June 1, 2009;
89(6):
615 - 616.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|
|