This Article Full Text (OnlineFirst PDF) All Versions of this Article: 1545968308317973v1 23/2/143    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Blicher, J. U. Articles by Nielsen, J. F. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Blicher, J. U. Articles by Nielsen, J. F. Pubmed/NCBI databases Medline Plus Health Information Exercise for Children Exercise and Physical Fitness Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Cortical and Spinal Excitability Changes After Robotic Gait Training in Healthy Participants

^* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: neujbl{at}sc.aaa.dk.

	Abstract

Background. Recent studies have proposed a role for robotic gait training in participants with acquired brain injury, but the effects on the excitability of cortical and spinal neurons even in healthy participants are uncertain. Objective. To investigate changes in corticospinal excitability in healthy participants after active and passive robotic gait training in a driven gait orthosis (DGO), the Lokomat. Methods. Thirteen healthy participants took part in 2 experiments. Each participant performed 20 minutes of active and passive gait training in a DGO. Motor evoked potentials (MEP), short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI), intracortical facilitation (ICF), F-wave frequency, and Mmax were measured in the right tibialis anterior muscle before and after training. Results. Active training led to a decline in MEP amplitude and F-wave frequency. The MEP decline was associated with subjective muscle fatigue. Passive training induced a decrease in SICI lasting for 20 minutes after training. Conclusions. The decline in MEP after active training is most likely because of central fatigue, whereas the decreased F-wave frequency might represent short-term plastic changes in the spinal cord. The decrease in SICI after passive training probably reflects a decrease in intracortical GABA activity, which could benefit the acquisition of new motor skills.

First published on December 1, 2008, doi:10.1177/1545968308317973

Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair 2009;23:143.

A more recent version of this article appeared on February 1, 2009


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				B. H. Dobkin Progressive Staging of Pilot Studies to Improve Phase III Trials for Motor Interventions Neurorehabil Neural Repair, March 1, 2009; 23(3): 197 - 206. [Abstract] [PDF]