This Article Full Text (OnlineFirst PDF) All Versions of this Article: 1545968307311103v1 22/4/374    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Hermsdörfer, J. Articles by Nowak, D. A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Hermsdörfer, J. Articles by Nowak, D. A. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Preserved and Impaired Aspects of Feed-Forward Grip Force Control After Chronic Somatosensory Deafferentation

^* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: Joachim.Hermsdoerfer{at}extern.lrz-muenchen.de.

	Abstract

Background. Although feed-forward mechanisms of grip force control are a prerequisite for skilled object manipulation, somatosensory feedback is essential to acquire, maintain, and adapt these mechanisms. Objective. Individuals with complete peripheral deafferentation provide the unique opportunity to study the function of the motor system deprived of somatosensory feedback. Methods. Two individuals (GL and IW) with complete chronic deafferentation of the trunk and limbs were tested during cyclic vertical movements of a handheld object. Such movements induce oscillating loads that are typically anticipated by parallel modulations of the grip force. Load magnitude was altered by varying either the movement frequency or object weight. Results. GL and IW employed excessive grip forces probably reflecting a compensatory mechanism. Despite this overall force increase, both deafferented participants adjusted their grip force level according to the load magnitude, indicating preserved scaling of the background grip force to physical demands. The dynamic modulation of the grip force with the load force was largely absent in GL, whereas in IW only slower movements were clearly affected. Conclusions. The authors hypothesize that the deafferented patients may have utilized visual and vestibular cues and/or an efferent copy of the motor command of the arm movement to scale the grip force level. Severely impaired grip force-load coupling in GL suggests that sensory information is important for maintaining a precise internal model of dynamic grip force control. However, comparably better performance in IW argues for the possibility that alternative cues can be used to trigger a residual internal model.

First published on January 25, 2008, doi:10.1177/1545968307311103

Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair 2008;22:374.

A more recent version of this article appeared on July 1, 2008


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				V. Iyengar, M. J. Santos, M. Ko, and A. S. Aruin Grip Force Control in Individuals With Multiple Sclerosis Neurorehabil Neural Repair, October 1, 2009; 23(8): 855 - 861. [Abstract] [PDF]