|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Nogo-66 Receptor Antagonist Peptide (NEP1-40) Administration Promotes Functional Recovery and Axonal Growth After Lateral Funiculus Injury in the Adult Rat
Yang Cao, MD*,
J. S. Shumsky, PhD,
M. A. Sabol,
R. A. Kushner,
S. Strittmatter, PhD,
F. P. T. Hamers, PhD,
D. H. S. Lee, PhD,
S. A. Rabacchi, PhD,
and
M. Murray, PhD
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: yc94{at}drexel.edu.
 |
Abstract |
|---|
Objective. The myelin protein Nogo inhibits axon regeneration by binding to its receptor (NgR) on axons. Intrathecal delivery of an NgR antagonist (NEP1-40) promotes growth of injured corticospinal axons and recovery of motor function following a dorsal hemisection. The authors used a similar design to examine recovery and repair after a lesion that interrupts the rubrospinal tract (RST). Methods. Rats received a lateral funiculotomy at C4 and NEP1-40 or vehicle was delivered to the cervical spinal cord for 4 weeks. Outcome measures included motor and sensory tests and immunohistochemistry. Results. Gait analysis showed recovery in the NEP1-40-treated group compared to operated controls, and a test of forelimb usage also showed a beneficial effect. The density of labeled RST axons increased ipsilaterally in the NEP1-40 group in the lateral funiculus rostral to the lesion and contralaterally in both gray and white matter. Thus, rubrospinal axons exhibited diminished dieback and/or growth up to the lesion site. This was accompanied by greater density of 5HT and calcitonin gene-related peptide axons adjacent to and into the lesion/matrix site in the NEP1-40 group. Conclusions. NgR blockade after RST injury is associated with axonal growth and/or diminished dieback of severed RST axons up to but not into or beyond the lesion/matrix site, and growth of serotonergic and dorsal root axons adjacent to and into the lesion/matrix site. NgR blockade also supported partial recovery of function. The authors results indicate that severed rubrospinal axons respond to NEP1-40 treatment but less robustly than corticospinal, raphe-spinal, or dorsal root axons.
First published on November 30, 2007, doi:10.1177/1545968307308550
Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair 2008;22:262.
A more recent version of this article appeared on June 1, 2008

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. D. Galvan, S. Luchetti, A. M. Burgos, H. X. Nguyen, M. J. Hooshmand, F. P. T. Hamers, and A. J. Anderson
Deficiency in Complement C1q Improves Histological and Functional Locomotor Outcome after Spinal Cord Injury
J. Neurosci.,
December 17, 2008;
28(51):
13876 - 13888.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. P. Horn, S. A. Busch, A. L. Hawthorne, N. van Rooijen, and J. Silver
Another Barrier to Regeneration in the CNS: Activated Macrophages Induce Extensive Retraction of Dystrophic Axons through Direct Physical Interactions
J. Neurosci.,
September 17, 2008;
28(38):
9330 - 9341.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|
|