SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (OnlineFirst PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
1545968307307118v1
22/2/154    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dechaumont-Palacin, S.
Right arrow Articles by Loubinoux, I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dechaumont-Palacin, S.
Right arrow Articles by Loubinoux, I.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
Medline Plus Health Information
*MRI Scans
*Stroke
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Article

Neural Correlates of Proprioceptive Integration in the Contralesional Hemisphere of Very Impaired Patients Shortly After a Subcortical Stroke: An fMRI Study

S. Dechaumont-Palacin, MD, P. Marque, PhD, MD, X. De Boissezon, PhD, MD, E. Castel-Lacanal, MD, C. Carel, MD, I. Berry, PhD, MD, J. Pastor, PhD, J. F. Albucher, MD, F. Chollet, PhD, MD, and I. Loubinoux, PhD*

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: loubinou{at}toulouse.inserm.fr.


   Abstract
Background. The effects of physiotherapy are difficult to assess in very impaired early stroke patients. Objective. The aim of the study was to characterize the impact of 4 weeks of passive proprioceptive training of the wrist on brain sensorimotor activation after stroke. Methods. Patients with a subcortical ischemic lesion of the pyramidal tract were randomly assigned to a control or a wrist-training group. All patients had a single pure motor hemiplegia with severe motor deficit. The control group (6 patients) underwent standard Bobath rehabilitation. The second,"trained,"group (7 patients) received Bobath rehabilitation plus 4 weeks of proprioceptive training with daily passive calibrated wrist extension. Before and after the training period, patients were examined with validated clinical scales and functional MRI (fMRI) while executing a passive movement versus rest. The effect of standard rehabilitation on sensorimotor activation was assessed in the control group on the wrist, and the effect of standard rehabilitation plus proprioceptive training was assessed in the trained group. The effect of 4-week proprioceptive training alone was statistically evaluated by difference between groups. Results. Standard rehabilitation along with natural recovery mainly led to increases in ipsilesional activation and decreases in contralesional activation. On the contrary, standard rehabilitation and paretic wrist proprioceptive training increased contralesional activation. Proprioceptive training produced change in the supplementary motor area (SMA), pre-frontal cortex, and a contralesional network including inferior parietal cortex (lower part of BA 40), secondary sensory cortex, and ventral premotor cortex (PMv). Conclusion. We have demonstrated that purely passive proprioceptive training applied for 4 weeks is able to modify brain sensorimotor activity after a stroke. This training revealed fMRI change in the ventral premotor and parietal cortices of the contralesional hemisphere, which are secondary sensorimotor areas. Recent studies have demonstrated the crucial role of these areas in severely impaired patients. We propose that increased contralesional activity in secondary sensorimotor areas likely facilitates control of recovered motor function by simple proprioceptive integration in those patients with poor recovery.

First published on October 4, 2007, doi:10.1177/1545968307307118

Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair 2008;22:154.

A more recent version of this article appeared on April 1, 2008


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




Advertisement