This Article Free Full Text (Free OnlineFirst PDF) All Versions of this Article: 1545968307307115v1 1545968307307115v2 1545968307307115v3 22/3/228    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Hiscock, A. Articles by Pomeroy, V. M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Hiscock, A. Articles by Pomeroy, V. M. Pubmed/NCBI databases Medline Plus Health Information Electromagnetic Fields Movement Disorders Stroke Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Informing Dose-Finding Studies of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation To Enhance Motor Function: A Qualitative Systematic Review

^* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: v.pomeroy{at}sghl.ac.uk.

	Abstract

Objective. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) of the lesioned hemisphere might enhance motor recovery after stroke, but the appropriate dose (parameters of rTMS) remains uncertain. The present review collates evidence of the effect of rTMS on corticospinal pathway excitability and motor function in healthy adults and in people after stroke. Methods. The authors searched MEDLINE and EMBASE (1996 to April 2007), their own collection of peer-reviewed articles, and the reference lists of included studies. They included healthy adults or people with stroke who received rTMS to the primary motor cortex to facilitate or inhibit contralateral corticospinal excitability or movement control. Findings. Of the 625 references identified, 37 studies were included with 455 healthy adults (34 studies) and 69 people with stroke (3 studies). For healthy adults, the effects of rTMS on corticospinal pathway excitability varied within each frequency, for example, 1 Hz rTMS was found to facilitate, inhibit, and have no effect on amplitude of motor-evoked potentials (MEPs). After stroke there was a trend for recovery of MEPs (ie, presence of MEPs) after 10 daily sessions of 3 Hz rTMS (one study). Motor function in healthy adults might be adversely affected by 1 Hz rTMS (two studies), whereas combined frequency rTMS was found to have no effect (one study). Interpretation. There is as yet insufficient published evidence to guide the dose of rTMS to the lesioned hemisphere after stroke to improve recovery of a paretic limb. Moreover, it is apparent that there is variability in response to rTMS in healthy adults. Dose-finding studies in groups of well-characterized stroke patients are needed.

First published on November 16, 2007, doi:10.1177/1545968307307115

Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair 2008;22:228.

A more recent version of this article appeared on June 1, 2008


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				E. B. Plow, J. R. Carey, R. J. Nudo, and A. Pascual-Leone Invasive Cortical Stimulation to Promote Recovery of Function After Stroke: A Critical Appraisal Stroke, May 1, 2009; 40(5): 1926 - 1931. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. H. Dobkin Progressive Staging of Pilot Studies to Improve Phase III Trials for Motor Interventions Neurorehabil Neural Repair, March 1, 2009; 23(3): 197 - 206. [Abstract] [PDF]