Effects of Robot-Assisted Therapy on Upper Limb Recovery After Stroke: A Systematic Review

¹ VU University Medical Center Amsterdam, and Rudolf Magnus Institute of NeuroScience, University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands
² Research Bureau, Isala Klinieken Zwolle, The Netherlands
³ Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA; Weill Medical College, Cornell University, White Plains, NY; and University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD

^* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: g.kwakkel{at}planet.nl.

	Abstract

Objective. The aim of the study was to present a systematic review of studies that investigate the effects of robot-assisted therapy on motor and functional recovery in patients with stroke. Methods. A database of articles published up to October 2006 was compiled using the following Medline key words: cerebral vascular accident, cerebral vascular disorders, stroke, paresis, hemiplegia, upper extremity, arm, and robot. References listed in relevant publications were also screened. Studies that satisfied the following selection criteria were included: (1) patients were diagnosed with cerebral vascular accident; (2) effects of robot-assisted therapy for the upper limb were investigated; (3) the outcome was measured in terms of motor and/or functional recovery of the upper paretic limb; and (4) the study was a randomized clinical trial (RCT). For each outcome measure, the estimated effect size (ES) and the summary effect size (SES) expressed in standard deviation units (SDU) were calculated for motor recovery and functional ability (activities of daily living [ADLs]) using fixed and random effect models. Ten studies, involving 218 patients, were included in the synthesis. Their methodological quality ranged from 4 to 8 on a (maximum) 10-point scale. Results. Meta-analysis showed a nonsignificant heterogeneous SES in terms of upper limb motor recovery. Sensitivity analysis of studies involving only shoulder-elbow robotics subsequently demonstrated a significant homogeneous SES for motor recovery of the upper paretic limb. No significant SES was observed for functional ability (ADL). Conclusion. As a result of marked heterogeneity in studies between distal and proximal arm robotics, no overall significant effect in favor of robot-assisted therapy was found in the present meta-analysis. However, subsequent sensitivity analysis showed a significant improvement in upper limb motor function after stroke for upper arm robotics. No significant improvement was found in ADL function. However, the administered ADL scales in the reviewed studies fail to adequately reflect recovery of the paretic upper limb, whereas valid instruments that measure outcome of dexterity of the paretic arm and hand are mostly absent in selected studies. Future research into the effects of robot-assisted therapy should therefore distinguish between upper and lower robotics arm training and concentrate on kinematical analysis to differentiate between genuine upper limb motor recovery and functional recovery due to compensation strategies by proximal control of the trunk and upper limb.

First published on September 17, 2007, doi:10.1177/1545968307305457

Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair 2008;22:111.

A more recent version of this article appeared on April 1, 2008


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. D. Ellis, T. Sukal-Moulton, and J. P. A. Dewald Progressive Shoulder Abduction Loading is a Crucial Element of Arm Rehabilitation in Chronic Stroke Neurorehabil Neural Repair, October 1, 2009; 23(8): 862 - 869. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. C. Lo, P. Guarino, H. I. Krebs, B. T. Volpe, C. T. Bever, P. W. Duncan, R. J. Ringer, T. H. Wagner, L. G. Richards, D. M. Bravata, et al. Multicenter Randomized Trial of Robot-Assisted Rehabilitation for Chronic Stroke: Methods and Entry Characteristics for VA ROBOTICS Neurorehabil Neural Repair, October 1, 2009; 23(8): 775 - 783. [Abstract] [PDF]

				T. Platz, S. van Kaick, J. Mehrholz, O. Leidner, C. Eickhof, and M. Pohl Best Conventional Therapy Versus Modular Impairment-Oriented Training for Arm Paresis After Stroke: A Single-Blind, Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial Neurorehabil Neural Repair, September 1, 2009; 23(7): 706 - 716. [Abstract] [PDF]

				B. T. Volpe, P. T. Huerta, J. L. Zipse, A. Rykman, D. Edwards, L. Dipietro, N. Hogan, and H. I. Krebs Robotic Devices as Therapeutic and Diagnostic Tools for Stroke Recovery Arch Neurol, September 1, 2009; 66(9): 1086 - 1090. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Chae, M. Y. Harley, T. Z. Hisel, C. M. Corrigan, J. A. Demchak, Y.-T. Wong, and Z.-P. Fang Intramuscular Electrical Stimulation for Upper Limb Recovery in Chronic Hemiparesis: An Exploratory Randomized Clinical Trial Neurorehabil Neural Repair, July 1, 2009; 23(6): 569 - 578. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A.M. Hughes, C.T. Freeman, J.H. Burridge, P.H. Chappell, P.L. Lewin, and E. Rogers Feasibility of Iterative Learning Control Mediated by Functional Electrical Stimulation for Reaching After Stroke Neurorehabil Neural Repair, July 1, 2009; 23(6): 559 - 568. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. J. Housman, K. M. Scott, and D. J. Reinkensmeyer A Randomized Controlled Trial of Gravity-Supported, Computer-Enhanced Arm Exercise for Individuals With Severe Hemiparesis Neurorehabil Neural Repair, June 1, 2009; 23(5): 505 - 514. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. M. Hammer and B. Lindmark Author Response Physical Therapy, June 1, 2009; 89(6): 541 - 542. [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Casadio, P. Giannoni, P. Morasso, and V. Sanguineti A proof of concept study for the integration of robot therapy with physiotherapy in the treatment of stroke patients Clinical Rehabilitation, March 1, 2009; 23(3): 217 - 228. [Abstract] [PDF]

				B. H. Dobkin Progressive Staging of Pilot Studies to Improve Phase III Trials for Motor Interventions Neurorehabil Neural Repair, March 1, 2009; 23(3): 197 - 206. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. S. Knutson, T. Z. Hisel, M. Y. Harley, and J. Chae A Novel Functional Electrical Stimulation Treatment for Recovery of Hand Function in Hemiplegia: 12-Week Pilot Study Neurorehabil Neural Repair, January 1, 2009; 23(1): 17 - 25. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. C. Lo and E. W. Triche Improving Gait in Multiple Sclerosis Using Robot-Assisted, Body Weight Supported Treadmill Training Neurorehabil Neural Repair, November 1, 2008; 22(6): 661 - 671. [Abstract] [PDF]

				T. A. Thrasher, V. Zivanovic, W. McIlroy, and M. R. Popovic Rehabilitation of Reaching and Grasping Function in Severe Hemiplegic Patients Using Functional Electrical Stimulation Therapy Neurorehabil Neural Repair, November 1, 2008; 22(6): 706 - 714. [Abstract] [PDF]