|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
 |
Time Course of Trunk, Arm, Leg, and Functional Recovery After Ischemic Stroke
Geert Verheyden, MSc, PhD1*,
Alice Nieuwboer, MSc, PhD1,
Liesbet De Wit, MSc, PhD1,
Vincent Thijs, MD, PhD,
Jan Dobbelaere, MD2,
Hannes Devos, MSc1,
Deborah Severijns, MSc1,
Stefanie Vanbeveren, MSc1,
and
Willy De Weerdt, MSc, PhD1
1 Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Leuven, Belgium
2 Heilig Hart Ziekenhuis Leuven, Department of Neurology, Leuven, Belgium
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: gv{at}soton.ac.uk.
 |
Abstract |
|---|
Background. Patterns of recovery provide useful information concerning the potential of physical recovery over time and therefore the setting of realistic goals for rehabilitation programs. Objective. To compare the time course of trunk recovery with the patterns of recovery of arm, leg, and functional ability. Methods. Consecutive stroke patients were recruited in 2 acute neurology wards. Participants were evaluated at 1 week, 1 month, and 3 and 6 months after stroke. Patients were assessed with the Trunk Impairment Scale, Fugl-Meyer arm and leg test, and Barthel Index. Results. Thirty-two patients were included in the study. There were no dropouts. Repeated measures analysis of the recovery patterns of motor and functional performance revealed the most striking improvement for all measures from 1 week to 1 month (P value between .0021 and <.0001) and a significant improvement from 1 month to 3 months after stroke (P value ranges from .0008 to <.0001). No significant improvement was found between 3 and 6 months after stroke for any of the measures. Statistical analysis revealed no significant difference between time course of trunk, arm, leg, and functional recovery (P = .2565). No significant differences in level of motor and functional recovery were found at the different time points. Conclusions. Separate analyses of motor and functional recovery patterns after stroke confirm the importance of the first month for recovery. Contrary to common belief, the time course of recovery of the trunk is similar to the recovery of arm, leg, and functional ability.
First published on September 17, 2007, doi:10.1177/1545968307305456
Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair 2008;22:173.
A more recent version of this article appeared on April 1, 2008

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. Castel-Lacanal, P. Marque, J. Tardy, X. de Boissezon, V. Guiraud, F. Chollet, I. Loubinoux, and M. Simonetta-Moreau
Induction of Cortical Plastic Changes in Wrist Muscles by Paired Associative Stimulation in the Recovery Phase of Stroke Patients
Neurorehabil Neural Repair,
May 1, 2009;
23(4):
366 - 372.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. F. Levin, J. A. Kleim, and S. L. Wolf
What Do Motor "Recovery" and "Compensation" Mean in Patients Following Stroke?
Neurorehabil Neural Repair,
May 1, 2009;
23(4):
313 - 319.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Siengsukon and L. A. Boyd
Sleep Enhances Off-line Spatial and Temporal Motor Learning After Stroke
Neurorehabil Neural Repair,
May 1, 2009;
23(4):
327 - 335.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. Verheyden, L. Vereeck, S. Truijen, M. Troch, C. LaFosse, W. Saeys, E. Leenaerts, A. Palinckx, and W. De Weerdt
Additional Exercises Improve Trunk Performance After Stroke: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial
Neurorehabil Neural Repair,
March 1, 2009;
23(3):
281 - 286.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Askim, B. Indredavik, T. Vangberg, and A. Haberg
Motor Network Changes Associated With Successful Motor Skill Relearning After Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Longitudinal Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study
Neurorehabil Neural Repair,
March 1, 2009;
23(3):
295 - 304.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. A. van Kuijk, J. W. Pasman, H. T. Hendricks, M. J. Zwarts, and A. C. H. Geurts
Predicting Hand Motor Recovery in Severe Stroke: The Role of Motor Evoked Potentials in Relation to Early Clinical Assessment
Neurorehabil Neural Repair,
January 1, 2009;
23(1):
45 - 51.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. L. Woodbury, D. R. Howland, T. E. McGuirk, S. B. Davis, C. R. Senesac, S. Kautz, and L. G. Richards
Effects of Trunk Restraint Combined With Intensive Task Practice on Poststroke Upper Extremity Reach and Function: A Pilot Study
Neurorehabil Neural Repair,
January 1, 2009;
23(1):
78 - 91.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. H. Buurke, A. V. Nene, G. Kwakkel, V. Erren-Wolters, M. J. IJzerman, and H. J. Hermens
Recovery of Gait After Stroke: What Changes?
Neurorehabil Neural Repair,
November 1, 2008;
22(6):
676 - 683.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|
|