SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (OnlineFirst PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
1545968307302923v1
22/1/31    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Caimmi, M.
Right arrow Articles by Molteni, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Caimmi, M.
Right arrow Articles by Molteni, F.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Article

Using Kinematic Analysis to Evaluate Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy in Chronic Stroke Patients

Marco Caimmi, IR1*, Stefano Carda, MD1, Chiara Giovanzana, MD1, Eliseo Stefano Maini, PhD2, Angelo Maria Sabatini, PhD2, Nicola Smania, MD3, Franco Molteni, MD1

1 Villa Beretta Rehabilitation Center, Ospedale Valduce, Costamasnaga, Italy
2 ARTS Lab, Scuola Superiore Sant’Anna, Pisa, Italy
3 Centro di Rieducazione Funzionale, Policlinico G. B. Rossi, Verona, Italy

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: marco.caimmi{at}gmail.com.


   Abstract
Objective. This preliminary study aims to verify if the method of kinematic analysis proposed here may be suitable for evaluating the effects of constraint-induced movement therapy (CIMT) in chronic stroke patients and may be of help in the study of the mechanisms underlying functional improvement following CIMT. Methods. Clinical and kinematic data were collected from a group of chronic stroke patients and from an age-matched healthy control group. Affected and less affected upper-limb kinematics related to hand-to-mouth and reaching movements were acquired before and immediately after 2 weeks of CIMT. Healthy subjects were submitted to kinematic analysis of the nondominant side and reevaluated after 2 weeks. Results. The clinical results were consistent with those reported in the literature and showed motor function improvement of the hemiparetic limb after CIMT. Kinematic data of the healthy control group showed high test-retest reliability. Statistically significant differences between the affected limb and both the less affected limb and the healthy subjects’ nondominant limb were observed. After CIMT, kinematic data showed improvement in the speed of movement and in measures related to the capacity for coordination. Conclusions. The method of kinematic analysis was sensitive for an assessment of motor recovery induced by CIMT. The kinematic results suggest that the increase in the use of the paretic limb in activities of daily living after the intervention is not only attributable to the patient's increased attention to it and better hand dexterity, but it is also a consequence of the improved speed of movement and better coordination between shoulder and elbow joints.

First published on June 26, 2007, doi:10.1177/1545968307302923

Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair 2008;22:31.

A more recent version of this article appeared on February 1, 2008


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Neurorehabil Neural RepairHome page
K.-c. Lin, Y.-f. Chang, C.-y. Wu, and Y.-a. Chen
Effects of Constraint-Induced Therapy Versus Bilateral Arm Training on Motor Performance, Daily Functions, and Quality of Life in Stroke Survivors
Neurorehabil Neural Repair, June 1, 2009; 23(5): 441 - 448.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Neurorehabil Neural RepairHome page
K.-c. Lin, Y.-w. Hsieh, C.-y. Wu, C.-l. Chen, Y. Jang, and J.-s. Liu
Minimal Detectable Change and Clinically Important Difference of the Wolf Motor Function Test in Stroke Patients
Neurorehabil Neural Repair, June 1, 2009; 23(5): 429 - 434.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
Y.-w. Hsieh, C.-y. Wu, K.-c. Lin, Y.-f. Chang, C.-l. Chen, and J.-s. Liu
Responsiveness and Validity of Three Outcome Measures of Motor Function After Stroke Rehabilitation
Stroke, April 1, 2009; 40(4): 1386 - 1391.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Neurorehabil Neural RepairHome page
M. L. Woodbury, D. R. Howland, T. E. McGuirk, S. B. Davis, C. R. Senesac, S. Kautz, and L. G. Richards
Effects of Trunk Restraint Combined With Intensive Task Practice on Poststroke Upper Extremity Reach and Function: A Pilot Study
Neurorehabil Neural Repair, January 1, 2009; 23(1): 78 - 91.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
ptjournalHome page
J. M Wagner, J. A Rhodes, and C. Patten
Reproducibility and Minimal Detectable Change of Three-Dimensional Kinematic Analysis of Reaching Tasks in People With Hemiparesis After Stroke
Physical Therapy, May 1, 2008; 88(5): 652 - 663.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Advertisement