SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (OnlineFirst PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
1545968307300437v1
21/5/435    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McDonnell, M. N.
Right arrow Articles by Ridding, M. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by McDonnell, M. N.
Right arrow Articles by Ridding, M. C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Article

Influence of Combined Afferent Stimulation and Task-Specific Training Following Stroke: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

Michelle N. McDonnell, PhD1*, Susan L. Hillier, PhD2, Timothy S. Miles, PhD, DSc1, Philip D. Thompson, PhD, FRACP3, Michael C. Ridding, PhD1

1 Research Centre for Human Movement Control, School of Molecular and Biomedical Science, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
2 Research Centre for Human Movement Control, School of Molecular and Biomedical Science, The University of Adelaide, and University of South Australia, Australia
3 School of Molecular and Biomedical Science and Dept. of Medicine, University of Adelaide, and Dept. of Neurology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, Australia

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: michelle.mcdonnell{at}adelaide.edu.au.


   Abstract
Background. Reorganization of the human motor cortex can be induced by specific patterns of peripheral afferent stimulation. The potential for afferent stimulation to facilitate the functional recovery associated with conventional rehabilitative techniques has not previously been investigated. Objective. The authors sought to determine whether combining appropriate afferent stimulation with task-specific training resulted in greater improvements than training alone in patients with impaired upper limb function in the subacute phase following stroke. Method. Twenty patients with hemiparesis due to stroke were allocated randomly to either a stimulation or control group. All received 9 sessions of task-specific physiotherapy training over 3 weeks. Prior to each training session, associative electrical stimulation of the motor point of 2 hand muscles was given in the stimulation group, whereas the control group received sham stimulation. Changes in dexterity were assessed using a grip-lift task, and standard measures of upper-limb function were made before and following the intervention. Corticospinal excitability was examined using transcranial magnetic stimulation. Results. Both groups showed comparable improvements in functional measures of upper-limb function. Of the 20 patients, only 14 could perform the grip-lift task, which is an objective measure of dexterity. Patients in the stimulation group exhibited significantly greater improvements in this task than the control group. There was no significant change in corticospinal excitability in either group. Conclusion. This pilot study provides preliminary data suggesting that targeted afferent stimulation may facilitate the response to conventional rehabilitation in patients with hemiparesis due to stroke, but these results need to be confirmed in a larger scale study.

First published on April 3, 2007, doi:10.1177/1545968307300437

Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair 2007;21:435.

A more recent version of this article appeared on October 1, 2007


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. PsychiatryHome page
D. J Werring
Improving hand motor control after stroke
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, June 1, 2009; 80(6): 586 - 586.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Neurorehabil Neural RepairHome page
A. Klaiput and W. Kitisomprayoonkul
Increased Pinch Strength in Acute and Subacute Stroke Patients After Simultaneous Median and Ulnar Sensory Stimulation
Neurorehabil Neural Repair, May 1, 2009; 23(4): 351 - 356.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
P. Celnik, N.-J. Paik, Y. Vandermeeren, M. Dimyan, and L. G. Cohen
Effects of Combined Peripheral Nerve Stimulation and Brain Polarization on Performance of a Motor Sequence Task After Chronic Stroke
Stroke, May 1, 2009; 40(5): 1764 - 1771.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Neurorehabil Neural RepairHome page
B. H. Dobkin
Progressive Staging of Pilot Studies to Improve Phase III Trials for Motor Interventions
Neurorehabil Neural Repair, March 1, 2009; 23(3): 197 - 206.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
M. V. Sale, M. C. Ridding, and M. A. Nordstrom
Cortisol Inhibits Neuroplasticity Induction in Human Motor Cortex
J. Neurosci., August 13, 2008; 28(33): 8285 - 8293.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Advertisement