Assessment of Walking Speed and Distance in Subjects With an Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury

¹ Spinal Cord Injury Center, Balgrist University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland
² Spinal Cord Injury Center, Balgrist University Hospital, and European Multicenter Study of Human Spinal Cord Injury Group, Zurich, Switerland
³ EM-SCI Group, Zurich, Switerland, and ICORD and Division of Neurology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada

^* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: hvanhedel{at}paralab.balgrist.ch.

	Abstract

Background. The 10-meter walk test and 6-minute walk test are increasingly used to evaluate the recovery of walking in patients with incomplete spinal cord injury. So far, there is no evidence whether the application of different walking distances provides complementary information about ambulatory capacity in patients with incomplete spinal cord injury. Studies about testing preferred and maximum speeds in subjects with incomplete spinal cord injury are lacking. Objective. To determine whether the combined testing of short and long distances as well as preferred and maximum speeds provides additional information about walking capacity in subjects with incomplete spinal cord injury. Methods. Depending on the objective, the subjects with incomplete spinal cord injury and age-matched control subjects had to perform the 10-meter walk test or 6-minute walk test at preferred and/or maximum walking speed. Results. During recovery, the preferred walking speed increased but did not differ when assessed during short or long distances in 51 subjects with incomplete spinal cord injury at 1, 3, and 6 months after injury (mean and SD, 6-minute walk test: 0.37 ± 0.52, 0.87 ± 0.56, and 1.14 ± 0.52 ms^-1; 10-meter walk test: 0.40 ± 0.53, 0.88 ± 0.51, and 1.12 ± 0.51 ms^-1, respectively). In 18 subjects with incomplete spinal cord injury, both preferred and maximum walking speeds assessed with the 10-meter walk test predicted the walking speeds of the 6-minute walk test well. Subjects with incomplete spinal cord injury prefer to walk closer to their maximum walking speed (74% ± 10%) compared to control subjects (59% ± 8%). Conclusions. The velocity used for the 6-minute walking distance and the 10-meter walking speed provides comparable information in patients with incomplete spinal cord injury who can perform both tests. However, tests of the preferred and maximum walking speed add information about walking capacity. Due to the easier applicability of the 10-meter walk test in the clinical setting, the authors suggest performing this test at the preferred and maximum speeds for the assessment of walking capacity by 1 month after incomplete spinal cord injury.

First published on March 12, 2007, doi:10.1177/1545968306297861

Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair 2007;21:295.

A more recent version of this article appeared on July 1, 2007


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				H. Kumru, J. Vidal, M. Perez, P. Schestatsky, and J. Valls-Sole Sympathetic Skin Responses Evoked by Different Stimuli Modalities in Spinal Cord Injury Patients Neurorehabil Neural Repair, July 1, 2009; 23(6): 553 - 558. [Abstract] [PDF]

				H. J. A. van Hedel Gait Speed in Relation to Categories of Functional Ambulation After Spinal Cord Injury Neurorehabil Neural Repair, May 1, 2009; 23(4): 343 - 350. [Abstract] [PDF]

				B. H. Dobkin Progressive Staging of Pilot Studies to Improve Phase III Trials for Motor Interventions Neurorehabil Neural Repair, March 1, 2009; 23(3): 197 - 206. [Abstract] [PDF]

				H. Barbeau, R. Elashoff, D. Deforge, J. Ditunno, M. Saulino, and B.H. Dobkin Comparison of Speeds Used for the 15.2-Meter and 6-Minute Walks Over the Year After an Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury: The SCILT Trial Neurorehabil Neural Repair, July 1, 2007; 21(4): 302 - 306. [Abstract] [PDF]