|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
 |
Comparison of Finger Tracking versus Simple Movement Training via Telerehabilitation to Alter Hand Function and Cortical Reorganization after Stroke
James R. Carey, PT, PhD1*,
William K. Durfee, PhD2,
Ela Bhatt1,
Ashima Nagpal1,
Samantha A. Weinstein, MS2,
Kathleen M. Anderson, PT, MBA1,
Scott M. Lewis, MD, PhD3
1 Program in Physical Therapy, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis
2 Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis
3 Department of Neurology, University of Minnesota Medical School, and Brain Sciences Center, VA Medical Center, Minneapolis
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: carey007{at}umn.edu.
 |
Abstract |
|---|
Objective. To compare 2 telerehabilitation training strategies, repetitive tracking movements versus repetitive simple movements, to promote brain reorganization and recovery of hand function. Methods. Twenty subjects with chronic stroke and 10 degrees of voluntary finger extension were randomly assigned to receive 1800 telerehabilitation trials over 2 weeks of either computerized tracking training (track group) with the affected finger and wrist involving temporospatial processing to achieve accuracy or movement training (move group) with no attention to accuracy. Following movement training, the move group crossed over to receive an additional 2 weeks of tracking training. Behavioral changes were measured with the Box and Block test, Jebsen Taylor test, and finger range of motion, along with a finger-tracking activation paradigm during fMRI. Results. The track group showed significant improvement in all 4 behavioral tests; the move group improved in the Box and Block and Jebsen Taylor tests. The improvement for the track group in the Box and Block and Jebsen Taylor tests did not surpass that for the move group. A consistent group pattern of brain reorganization was not evident. The move group, after crossing over, did not show further significant improvements. Conclusion. Telerehabilitation may be effective in improving performance in subjects with chronic stroke. Tracking training with reinforcement to enhance learning, however, did not produce a clear advantage over the same amount of practice of random movements. Two weeks of training may be insufficient to demonstrate a behavioral advantage and associated brain reorganization.
First published on March 9, 2007, doi:10.1177/1545968306292381
Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair 2007;21:216.
A more recent version of this article appeared on May 1, 2007

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. S. Knutson, T. Z. Hisel, M. Y. Harley, and J. Chae
A Novel Functional Electrical Stimulation Treatment for Recovery of Hand Function in Hemiplegia: 12-Week Pilot Study
Neurorehabil Neural Repair,
January 1, 2009;
23(1):
17 - 25.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. F. Meschia
Camera in the Emergency Department: The Evolution of Stroke Telemedicine
Mayo Clin. Proc.,
January 1, 2009;
84(1):
3 - 4.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|
|