This Article Abstract Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by McDonnell, M. N. Articles by Ridding, M. C. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by McDonnell, M. N. Articles by Ridding, M. C. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Influence of Combined Afferent Stimulation and Task-Specific Training Following Stroke: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

Research Centre for Human Movement Control, School of Molecular and Biomedical Science, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide SA 5005 Australia, michelle.mcdonnell{at}adelaide.edu.au

Susan L. Hillier, PhD

Timothy S. Miles, PhD, DSc

Philip D. Thompson, PhD, FRACP

Michael C. Ridding, PhD

Background. Reorganization of the human motor cortex can be induced by specific patterns of peripheral afferent stimulation. The potential for afferent stimulation to facilitate the functional recovery associated with conventional rehabilitative techniques has not previously been investigated. Objective. The authors sought to determine whether combining appropriate afferent stimulation with task-specific training resulted in greater improvements than training alone in patients with impaired upper limb function in the subacute phase following stroke. Method. Twenty patients with hemiparesis due to stroke were allocated randomly to either a stimulation or control group. All received 9 sessions of task-specific physiotherapy training over 3 weeks. Prior to each training session, associative electrical stimulation of the motor point of 2 hand muscles was given in the stimulation group, whereas the control group received sham stimulation. Changes in dexterity were assessed using a grip-lift task, and standard measures of upper-limb function were made before and following the intervention. Corticospinal excitability was examined using transcranial magnetic stimulation. Results. Both groups showed comparable improvements in functional measures of upper-limb function. Of the 20 patients, only 14 could perform the grip-lift task, which is an objective measure of dexterity. Patients in the stimulation group From the Research Centre for Human Movement Control, School of exhibited significantly greater improvements in this task than the control group. There was no significant change in corticospinal excitability in either group. Conclusion. This pilot study provides preliminary data suggesting that targeted afferent stimulation may facilitate the response to conventional rehabilitation in patients with hemiparesis due to stroke, but these results need to be confirmed in a larger scale study.

Key Words: Plasticity • Stroke • Grip-lift task • Dexterity • Rehabilitation.

References

• Olsen TS Arm and leg paresis as outcome predictors in stroke rehabilitation. Stroke. 1990;21:247-251.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
• Lai SM, Studenski S., Duncan PW, et al. Persisting consequences of stroke measured by the Stroke Impact Scale. Stroke. 2002;33:1840-1844.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
• Nakayama H., Jorgensen HS, Raaschou HO, et al. Compensation in recovery of upper extremity function after stroke: the Copenhagen Stroke Study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1994;75:852-857.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
• Gowland C., deBruin H., Basmajian J., et al. Agonist and antagonist activity during voluntary upper-limb movement in patients with stroke. Phys Ther. 1992;72:624-633.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
• Richards L., Pohl P. Therapeutic interventions to improve upper extremity recovery and function. Clin Geriatr Med. 1999;15:819-832.[Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
• van der Lee J., Wagenaar R., Lankhorst G., et al. Forced use of the upper extremity in chronic stroke patients. Results from a singleblind randomized clinical trial. Stroke. 1999;30:2369-2375.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
• Nakayama H., Jorgensen HS, Raaschou HO, et al. Recovery of upper extremity function in stroke patients: the Copenhagen Stroke Study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1994;75:394-398.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
• Hermsdorfer J., Hagl E., Nowak DA, et al. Grip force control during object manipulation in cerebral stroke. Clin Neurophysiol. 2003;114:915-929.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
• Ridding MC, Brouwer B., Miles TS, et al. Changes in muscle responses to stimulation of the motor cortex induced by peripheral nerve stimulation in human subjects. Exp Brain Res. 2000; 131:135-143.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
• Muellbacher W., Ziemann U., Boroojerdi B., et al. Role of the human motor cortex in rapid motor learning. Exp Brain Res. 2001;136:431-438.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
• Garry MI, Kamen G., Nordstrom MA Hemispheric differences in the relationship between corticomotor excitability changes following a fine-motor task and motor learning. J Neurophysiol. 2004;91:1570-1578.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
• Kaelin-Lang A., Luft AR, Sawaki L., et al. Modulation of human corticomotor excitability by somatosensory input. J Physiol. 2002;540:623-633.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
• Nitsche MA, Paulus W. Excitability changes induced in the human motor cortex by weak transcranial direct current stimulation. J Physiol. 2000;527(Pt 3):633-639.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
• Stefan K., Kunesch E., Cohen LG, et al. Induction of plasticity in the human motor cortex by paired associative stimulation. Brain. 2000;123 (Pt 3):572-584.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
• McKay DR, Ridding MC, Thompson PD, Miles TS Induction of persistent changes in the organisation of the human motor cortex. Exp Brain Res. 2002;143:342-349.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
• McDonnell MN, Ridding MC Afferent stimulation facilitates performance on a novel motor task. Exp Brain Res. 2006: 109-115.
• Nitsche MA, Schauenburg A., Lang N., et al. Facilitation of implicit motor learning by weak transcranial direct current stimulation of the primary motor cortex in the human. J Cogn Neurosci. 2003;15:619-626.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
• Bütefisch CM, Khurana V., Kopylev L., et al. Enhancing encoding of a motor memory in the primary motor cortex by cortical stimulation. J Neurophysiol. 2004;91:2110-2116.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
• Muellbacher W., Richards C., Ziemann U., et al. Improving hand function in chronic stroke. Arch Neurol. 2002;59:1278-1282.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
• Liepert J., Graef S., Uhde I., Leidner O., Weiller C. Training- induced changes of motor cortex representations in stroke patients. Acta Neurol Scand. 2000;101:321-326.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
• Winstein CJ, Rose DK, Tan SM, et al. A randomized controlled comparison of upper-extremity rehabilitation strategies in acute stroke: a pilot study of immediate and long-term outcomes. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;85:620-628.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
• Page SJ Intensity versus task-specificity after stroke: how important is intensity? Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2003;82:730-732.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
• Jang SH, Kim YH, Cho SH, et al. Cortical reorganization induced by task-oriented training in chronic hemiplegic stroke patients. Neuroreport. 2003;14:137-141.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
• Uy J., Ridding MC, Hillier S., et al. Does induction of plastic change in motor cortex improve leg function after stroke? Neurology. 2003;61:982-984.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
• Conforto A., Kaelin-Lang A., Cohen L. Increase in hand muscle strength of stroke patients after somatosensory stimulation. Ann Neurol. 2002;51: 122-125.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
• Wu CW, Seo HJ, Cohen LG Influence of electric somatosensory stimulation on paretic-hand function in chronic stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006;87:351-357.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
• Brown JA, Lutsep HL, Weinand M., et al. Motor cortex stimulation for the enhancement of recovery from stroke: a prospective, multicenter safety study. Neurosurgery. 2006;58:464-473.[Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
• Hummel F., Celnik P., Giraux P., et al. Effects of non-invasive cortical stimulation on skilled motor function in chronic stroke. Brain. 2005;128:490-499.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
• Khedr EM, Ahmed MA, Fathy N., et al. Therapeutic trial of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation after acute ischemic stroke. Neurology. 2005;65:466-468.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
• Winstein C. Motor learning considerations in stroke rehabilitation. In: Duncan PW, Badke MB, eds. Stroke Rehabilitation: The Recovery of Motor Control. Chicago: Year Book Medical; 1987:109-134.
• Ridding MC, Uy J. Changes in motor cortical excitability induced by paired associative stimulation. Clin Neurophysiol. 2003;114: 1437-1444.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
• Westling G., Johansson RS Factors influencing the force control during precision grip. Exp Brain Res. 1984;53:277-284.[Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
• McDonnell MN, Hillier SL, Ridding MC, et al. Impairments in precision grip correlate with functional measures in adult hemiplegia. Clin Neurophysiol. 2006;117:1474-1480.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
• Duque J., Thonnard JL, Vandermeeren Y., et al. Correlation between impaired dexterity and corticospinal tract dysgenesis in congenital hemiplegia. Brain. 2003;126:732-747.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
• Rossini PM, Barker AT, Berardelli A., et al. Non-invasive electrical and magnetic stimulation of the brain, spinal cord and roots: basic principles and procedures for routine clinical application. Report of an IFCN committee. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1994; 91:79-92.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
• Ridding MC, Rothwell JC Stimulus/response curves as a method of measuring motor cortical excitability in man. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1997;105:340-344.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
• Devanne H., Lavoie BA, Capaday C. Input-output properties and gain changes in the human corticospinal pathway. Exp Brain Res. 1997;114:329-338.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
• Pitcher JB, Ogston KM, Miles TS Age and sex differences in human motor cortex input-output characteristics. J Physiol. 2003;546:605-613.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
• Lyle RC A performance test for assessment of upper limb function in physical rehabilitation treatment and research. Int J Rehabil Res. 1981;4:483-492.[Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
• Page SJ, Sisto S., Levine P., et al. Efficacy of modified constraintinduced movement therapy in chronic stroke: a single-blinded randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;85: 14-18.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
• Ward NS, Brown MM, Thompson AJ, et al. Neural correlates of outcome after stroke: a cross-sectional fMRI study. Brain. 2003;126:1430-1448.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
• Taub E., Miller NE, Novack TA, et al. Technique to improve chronic motor deficit after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1993; 74:347-354.[Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
• Uswatte G., Taub E., Morris D., et al. Reliability and validity of the upper-extremity Motor Activity Log-14 for measuring realworld arm use. Stroke. 2005;36:2493-2496.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
• van der Lee JH, Beckerman H., Knol DL, et al. Clinimetric properties of the motor activity log for the assessment of arm use in hemiparetic patients. Stroke. 2004;35:1410-1414.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
• McDonnell MN, Ridding MC, Flavel SC, et al. Effect of human grip strategy on force control in precision tasks. Exp Brain Res. 2005;161:368-373.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
• Pyndt HS, Ridding MC Modification of the human motor cortex by associative stimulation. Exp Brain Res. 2004;159:123-128.[Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
• Lemon RN, Griffiths J. Comparing the function of the corticospinal system in different species: organizational differences for motor specialization? Muscle Nerve. 2005;32:261-279.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
• Byrnes ML, Thickbroom GW, Phillips BA, et al. Long-term changes in motor cortical organisation after recovery from subcortical stroke. Brain Res. 2001;889:278-287.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
• Byrnes ML, Thickbroom GW, Phillips BA, et al. Physiological studies of the corticomotor projection to the hand after subcortical stroke. Clin Neurophysiol. 1999;110:487-498.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
• Traversa R., Cicinelli P., Bassi A., et al. Mapping of motor cortical reorganization after stroke. A brain stimulation study with focal magnetic pulses. Stroke. 1997;28:110-117.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
• Thickbroom GW, Byrnes ML, Archer SA, et al. Motor outcome after subcortical stroke: MEPs correlate with hand strength but not dexterity. Clin Neurophysiol. 2002;113:2025-2029.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
• Pascual-Leone A., Grafman J., Hallett M. Modulation of cortical motor output maps during development of implicit and explicit knowledge. Science. 1994;263:1287-1289.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
• Fugl-Meyer AR, Jaasko L., Leyman I., et al. The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. 1. a method for evaluation of physical performance. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1975;7:13-31.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

This version was published on October 1, 2007

Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, Vol. 21, No. 5, 435-443 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/1545968307300437


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. J Werring Improving hand motor control after stroke J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, June 1, 2009; 80(6): 586 - 586. [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Klaiput and W. Kitisomprayoonkul Increased Pinch Strength in Acute and Subacute Stroke Patients After Simultaneous Median and Ulnar Sensory Stimulation Neurorehabil Neural Repair, May 1, 2009; 23(4): 351 - 356. [Abstract] [PDF]

				P. Celnik, N.-J. Paik, Y. Vandermeeren, M. Dimyan, and L. G. Cohen Effects of Combined Peripheral Nerve Stimulation and Brain Polarization on Performance of a Motor Sequence Task After Chronic Stroke Stroke, May 1, 2009; 40(5): 1764 - 1771. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. H. Dobkin Progressive Staging of Pilot Studies to Improve Phase III Trials for Motor Interventions Neurorehabil Neural Repair, March 1, 2009; 23(3): 197 - 206. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. V. Sale, M. C. Ridding, and M. A. Nordstrom Cortisol Inhibits Neuroplasticity Induction in Human Motor Cortex J. Neurosci., August 13, 2008; 28(33): 8285 - 8293. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article Abstract Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by McDonnell, M. N. Articles by Ridding, M. C. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by McDonnell, M. N. Articles by Ridding, M. C. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?