|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Confounders in Rehabilitation Trials of Task-Oriented Training: Lessons From the Designs of the EXCITE and SCILT Multicenter Trials
Bruce H. Dobkin, MD
Department of Neurology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, bdobkin{at}mednet.ucla.edu
Two multicenter randomized clinical trials (MRCT), the Extremity Constraint Induced Therapy Evaluation (EXCITE) to improve upper extremity function after stroke and the Spinal Cord Injury Locomotor Trial (SCILT) to enable functional walking after incomplete spinal cord injury, demonstrate that complex, task-oriented physical therapies can be studied using a scientific methodology during inpatient or outpatient rehabilitation. In the past, a new therapys benefit may have been overestimated by comparing it to no treatment or to a conventional treatment at a low intensity of practice. Sample sizes were often too small and may have failed to detect the efficacy of a new intervention. In addition, whereas statistical significance in outcomes has been critical to understanding whether one treatment is better than another, the clinical significance of outcomes must also impact the interpretation of the results of a trial. MRCT designs will continue to improve through attention to the limitations of preclinical animal models that offer a conceptual basis for the treatment, from enrichment strategies at every phase of trial development, from more vigorous dose-response studies using adaptive methods, by capturing interim measures of behavior and functional neurophysiologic adaptations during the treatment phase, by aiming for a clinically meaningful control intervention, and by including ratio or interval outcome measures when feasible that capture a target of the intervention in relation to gains in daily functioning and quality of life.
Key Words: Rehabilitation Stroke Spinal cord injury Randomized clinical trials Treadmill training Constraint induced movement therapy Hemiplegia Paraplegia fMRI
References
- Dobkin BH, Apple D, Barbeau H, et al. Weight-supported tread-mill vs over-ground training for walking after acute incomplete SCI. Neurology 2006;66: 484-493.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Wolf S, Winstein C, Miller J, et al. Effect of constraint induced movement therapy on upper extremity function among patients 3-9 months following stroke: The EXCITE randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2006;296: 2095-2104.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Dobkin B, Apple D, Barbeau H, et al. Methods for a randomized trial of weight-supported treadmill training versus conventional training for walking during inpatient rehabilitation after incomplete traumatic spinal cord injury. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2003; 17: 153-167.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Winstein C, Miller J, Blanton S, et al. Methods for a multi-site randomized trial to investigate the effect of constraint-induced movement therapy in improving upper extremity function among adults recovering from a cerebrovascular stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2003;17: 137-152.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Dobkin B, Barbeau H, Deforge D, et al. The evolution of walking-related outcomes over the first 12 weeks of rehabilitation for incomplete traumatic spinal cord injury: multi-center randomized Spinal Cord Injury Locomotor Trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2007;21: 25-35.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Kwakkel G, Wagenaar R, Twisk J, Lankhorst G, Koetsier J. Intensity of leg and arm training after primary middle cerebral artery stroke: a randomised trial. Lancet 1999;354: 191-196.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Duncan P, Studenski S, Richards L, et al. Randomized clinical trial of therapeutic exercise in subacute stroke. Stroke 2003;34: 2173-2180.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Salbach NM, Mayo NE, Wood-Dauphinee S, Hanley JA, Richards CL, Cote R. A task-orientated intervention enhances walking distance and speed in the first year post stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil 2004;18: 509-519.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Kwakkel G, van Peppen R, Wagenaar R, et al. Effects of augmented exercise therapy time after stroke: a meta-analysis. Stroke 2004;35: 2529-2539.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Dobkin B. Curiosity and cure: Translational research strategies for neural repair-mediated rehabilitation. J Neurobiol 2006;in press.
- Frost S, Barbay S, Friel K, Plautz E, Nudo R. Reorganization of remote cortical regions after ischemic brain injury: a potential substrate for stroke recovery. J Neurophysiol 2003;89: 3205-3214.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Vaynman S, Gomez-Pinilla F. License to run: exercise impacts functional plasticity in the intact and injured CNS by using neurotrophins. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2005;19: 283-295.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Komitova M, Mattsson B, Johansson BB, Eriksson PS. Enriched environment increases neural stem/progenitor cell proliferation and neurogenesis in the subventricular zone of stroke-lesioned adult rats. Stroke 2005;36: 1278-1282.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- van der Harst J, Baars A-M, Spruit B. Standard housed rats are more sensitive to rewards than enriched housed rats as reflected by their anticipatory behavior. Behav Brain Res 2003;142: 151-156.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Dobkin BH. Behavioral, temporal, and spatial targets for cellular transplants as adjuncts to rehabilitation for stroke. Stroke 2006; 37: in press.
- Taub E, Miller N, Novack T, et al. Technique to improve chronic motor deficit after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1993;74: 347-354.[Web of Science][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Wolpaw J, Tennissen A. Activity-dependent spinal cord plasticity in health and disease. Rev Neurosci 2001;24: 807-843.[CrossRef]
- Rossignol S, Bouyer L, Barthelemy D, Langlet C, Leblond H. Recovery of locomotion in the cat following spinal cord lesions. Brain Res Rev 2002;40: 257-266.[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Fong AJ, Cai LL, Otoshi CK, et al. Spinal cord-transected mice learn to step in response to quipazine treatment and robotic training. J Neurosci 2005;25: 11738-11747.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Van Peppen R, Kwakkel G, Wood-Dauphinee S, Hendriks H, Van der Weiss P, Dekker J. The impact of physical therapy on functional outcomes after stroke: whats the evidence? Clin Rehabil 2004;18: 833-862.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Liepert J, Bauder H, Miltner W, Taub E, Weiller C. Treatment-induced cortical reorganization after stroke in humans. Stroke 2000;31: 1210-1216.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Hamzei F, Liepert J, Dettmers C, Weiller C, Rijntjes M. Two different reorganization patterns after rehabilitative therapy: An exploratory study with fMRI and TMS. Neuroimage 2006;31: 710-720.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Schaechter J, Kraft E, Hilliard T, Finkelstein S, Rosen B, Cramer S. Motor recovery and cortical reorganization after constraint-induced movement therapy in stroke patients. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2002;16: 326-338.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Wittenberg GF, Chen R, Ishii K, et al. Constraint-induced therapy in stroke: magnetic-stimulation motor maps and cerebral activation. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2003;17: 48-57.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Baron J-C, Cohen L, Cramer S, et al. Neuroimaging in stroke recovery: a position paper from the First International Workshop on Neuroimaging and Stroke Recovery. Cerebrovasc Dis 2004;18: 260-267.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Dobkin BH. Rehabilitation and functional neuroimaging dose-response trajectories for clinical trials. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2005;19: 276-282.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Dobkin B, Firestine A, West M, Saremi K, Woods R. Ankle dorsiflexion as an fMRI paradigm to assay motor control for walking during rehabilitation. Neuroimage 2004;23: 370-381.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Koski L, Mernar T, Dobkin B. Immediate and long-term changes in corticomotor output response to rehabilitation: correlation with functional improvements in chronic stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2004;18: 230-249.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Winchester P, McColl R, Querry R, et al. Changes in supraspinal activation patterns following robotic locomotor therapy in motor-incomplete spinal cord injury. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2005; 19: 313-324.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Dong Y, Dobkin BH, Cen SY, Wu AD, Winstein CJ. Motor cortex activation during treatment may predict therapeutic gains in paretic hand function after stroke. Stroke 2006;37: 1552-1555.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Dromerick A, Edwards D, Hahn M. Does the application of constraint-induced movement therapy during acute rehabilitation reduce arm impairment after ischemic stroke? Stroke 2000;31: 2984-2988.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Grotta J, Noser E, Ro T, et al. Constraint-induced movement therapy. Stroke 2004;35(suppl 1): 2699-2701.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Boake C, Noser E, Ro T, et al. Constraint-induced movement therapy during early stroke rehabilitation. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2007;21: 14-24.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Carmichael S. Cellular and molecular mechanisms of neural repair after stroke: making waves. Ann Neurol 2006;59: 735-742.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Dancause N.Vicarious function of remote cortex following stroke: recent evidence from human and animal studies. Neuroscientist 2006;12: 489-499.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Plummer P, Behrman A, Duncan P, et al. Effects of stroke severity and training duration on locomotor recovery after stroke: A pilot study. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. In press.
- Luft A, McCombe-Waller S, Whitall J, et al. Repetitive bilateral arm training and motor cortex activation in chronic stroke. JAMA 2004;292: 1853-1861.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Kwakkel G, Kollen BJ, van der Grond J, Prevo AJ. Probability of regaining dexterity in the flaccid upper limb: impact of severity of paresis and time since onset in acute stroke. Stroke 2003; 34(9): 2181-2186.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- van der Lee J. Constraint-induced therapy for stroke: more of the same or something completely different? Curr Opin Neurol 2001; 14: 741-744.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Rijntjes M, Hobbeling V, Hamzei F, et al. Individual factors in constraint-induced movement therapy after stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2005;19: 238-249.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Page SJ, Sisto S, Levine P, McGrath RE. Efficacy of modified constraint-induced movement therapy in chronic stroke: a single-blinded randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004; 85: 14-18.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Dettmers C, Teske U, Hamzei F, Uswatte G, Taub E, Weiller C. Distributed form of constraint-induced movement therapy improves functional outcome and quality of life after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2005;86: 204-209.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Higgins J, Salbach N, Wopod-Dauphinee S, Richards C, Cote R, Mayo N. The effect of a task-oriented intervention on arm function in people with stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil 2006;20: 296-310.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Wolf SL, Thompson PA, Morris DM, et al. The EXCITE Trial: attributes of the Wolf Motor Function Test in patients with sub-acute stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2005;19: 194-205.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Carey LM, Abbott DF, Egan GF, et al. Evolution of brain activation with good and poor motor recovery after stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2006;20: 24-41.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Ward N, Brown M, Thompson A, Frackowiak R. Longitudinal changes in cerebral response to proprioceptive input in individual patients after stroke: an fMRI study. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2006;20: 398-405.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Perry J, Garrett M, Gromley J, Mulroy S. Classification of walking handicap in the stroke population. Stroke 1995;26: 982-989.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Lord SE, Rochester L. Measurement of community ambulation after stroke. Current status and future developments. Stroke 2005;36: 1757-1761.
Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, Vol. 21, No. 1,
3-13 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/1545968306297329

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Clarke, H. Mala, V. Windle, G. Chernenko, and D. Corbett
The Effects of Repeated Rehabilitation "Tune-Ups" on Functional Recovery After Focal Ischemia in Rats
Neurorehabil Neural Repair,
November 1, 2009;
23(9):
886 - 894.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. H. Dobkin
Collaborative Models for Translational Neuroscience and Rehabilitation Research
Neurorehabil Neural Repair,
September 1, 2009;
23(7):
633 - 640.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. L. Wolf
On "Effects of forced use on arm function in the subacute phase..." Hammer AM, Lindmark B. Phys Ther. 2009;89:526-539.
Physical Therapy,
September 1, 2009;
89(9):
993 - 995.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. C. Cramer, B. H. Dobkin, E. A. Noser, R. W. Rodriguez, and L. A. Enney
Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind Study of Ropinirole in Chronic Stroke
Stroke,
September 1, 2009;
40(9):
3034 - 3038.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. W. Dromerick, C. E. Lang, R. L. Birkenmeier, J. M. Wagner, J. P. Miller, T. O. Videen, W. J. Powers, S. L. Wolf, and D. F. Edwards
Very Early Constraint-Induced Movement during Stroke Rehabilitation (VECTORS): A single-center RCT
Neurology,
July 21, 2009;
73(3):
195 - 201.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. S. K. Magnuson, R. R. Smith, E. H. Brown, G. Enzmann, C. Angeli, P. M. Quesada, and D. Burke
Swimming as a Model of Task-Specific Locomotor Retraining After Spinal Cord Injury in the Rat
Neurorehabil Neural Repair,
July 1, 2009;
23(6):
535 - 545.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K.-c. Lin, Y.-f. Chang, C.-y. Wu, and Y.-a. Chen
Effects of Constraint-Induced Therapy Versus Bilateral Arm Training on Motor Performance, Daily Functions, and Quality of Life in Stroke Survivors
Neurorehabil Neural Repair,
June 1, 2009;
23(5):
441 - 448.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. J. Housman, K. M. Scott, and D. J. Reinkensmeyer
A Randomized Controlled Trial of Gravity-Supported, Computer-Enhanced Arm Exercise for Individuals With Severe Hemiparesis
Neurorehabil Neural Repair,
June 1, 2009;
23(5):
505 - 514.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Bogard, S. Wolf, Qin Zhang, P. Thompson, D. Morris, and D. Nichols-Larsen
Can the Wolf Motor Function Test be Streamlined?
Neurorehabil Neural Repair,
June 1, 2009;
23(5):
422 - 428.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. M. Hammer and B. Lindmark
Effects of Forced Use on Arm Function in the Subacute Phase After Stroke: A Randomized, Clinical Pilot Study
Physical Therapy,
June 1, 2009;
89(6):
526 - 539.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K.-c. Lin, Y.-h. Huang, Y.-w. Hsieh, and C.-y. Wu
Potential Predictors of Motor and Functional Outcomes After Distributed Constraint-Induced Therapy for Patients With Stroke
Neurorehabil Neural Repair,
May 1, 2009;
23(4):
336 - 342.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. Castel-Lacanal, P. Marque, J. Tardy, X. de Boissezon, V. Guiraud, F. Chollet, I. Loubinoux, and M. Simonetta-Moreau
Induction of Cortical Plastic Changes in Wrist Muscles by Paired Associative Stimulation in the Recovery Phase of Stroke Patients
Neurorehabil Neural Repair,
May 1, 2009;
23(4):
366 - 372.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Donaldson, R. Tallis, S. Miller, A. Sunderland, R. Lemon, and V. Pomeroy
Effects of Conventional Physical Therapy and Functional Strength Training on Upper Limb Motor Recovery After Stroke: A Randomized Phase II Study
Neurorehabil Neural Repair,
May 1, 2009;
23(4):
389 - 397.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Hammer and B. Lindmark
Is forced use of the paretic upper limb beneficial? A randomized pilot study during subacute post-stroke recovery
Clinical Rehabilitation,
May 1, 2009;
23(5):
424 - 433.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. H. Dobkin
Progressive Staging of Pilot Studies to Improve Phase III Trials for Motor Interventions
Neurorehabil Neural Repair,
March 1, 2009;
23(3):
197 - 206.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Askim, B. Indredavik, T. Vangberg, and A. Haberg
Motor Network Changes Associated With Successful Motor Skill Relearning After Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Longitudinal Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study
Neurorehabil Neural Repair,
March 1, 2009;
23(3):
295 - 304.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Rijntjes, K. Haevernick, A. Barzel, H. van den Bussche, G. Ketels, and C. Weiller
Repeat Therapy for Chronic Motor Stroke: A Pilot Study for Feasibility and Efficacy
Neurorehabil Neural Repair,
March 1, 2009;
23(3):
275 - 280.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E.A.A. Rameckers, L.A.W.M. Speth, J. Duysens, J.S.H. Vles, and B.C.M. Smits-Engelsman
Botulinum Toxin-A in Children With Congenital Spastic Hemiplegia Does Not Improve Upper Extremity Motor-Related Function Over Rehabilitation Alone: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Neurorehabil Neural Repair,
March 1, 2009;
23(3):
218 - 225.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. L. Woodbury, D. R. Howland, T. E. McGuirk, S. B. Davis, C. R. Senesac, S. Kautz, and L. G. Richards
Effects of Trunk Restraint Combined With Intensive Task Practice on Poststroke Upper Extremity Reach and Function: A Pilot Study
Neurorehabil Neural Repair,
January 1, 2009;
23(1):
78 - 91.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Dickstein
Rehabilitation of Gait Speed After Stroke: A Critical Review of Intervention Approaches
Neurorehabil Neural Repair,
November 1, 2008;
22(6):
649 - 660.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. A. Thrasher, V. Zivanovic, W. McIlroy, and M. R. Popovic
Rehabilitation of Reaching and Grasping Function in Severe Hemiplegic Patients Using Functional Electrical Stimulation Therapy
Neurorehabil Neural Repair,
November 1, 2008;
22(6):
706 - 714.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. P. Yelnik, F. Le Breton, F. M. Colle, I. V. Bonan, C. Hugeron, V. Egal, E. Lebomin, J.-P. Regnaux, D. Perennou, and E. Vicaut
Rehabilitation of Balance After Stroke With Multisensorial Training: A Single-Blind Randomized Controlled Study
Neurorehabil Neural Repair,
September 1, 2008;
22(5):
468 - 476.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. N. Byl, E. A. Pitsch, and G. M. Abrams
Functional Outcomes Can Vary by Dose: Learning-Based Sensorimotor Training for Patients Stable Poststroke
Neurorehabil Neural Repair,
September 1, 2008;
22(5):
494 - 504.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Floel, F. Hummel, J. Duque, S. Knecht, and L. G. Cohen
Influence of Somatosensory Input on Interhemispheric Interactions in Patients With Chronic Stroke
Neurorehabil Neural Repair,
September 1, 2008;
22(5):
477 - 485.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. Simmons, N. Sharma, J.-C. Baron, and V. M. Pomeroy
Motor Imagery to Enhance Recovery After Subcortical Stroke: Who Might Benefit, Daily Dose, and Potential Effects
Neurorehabil Neural Repair,
September 1, 2008;
22(5):
458 - 467.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Wiles
Physiotherapy and related activities in multiple sclerosis
Multiple Sclerosis,
August 1, 2008;
14(7):
863 - 871.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J.-P. Regnaux, K. Saremi, J. Marehbian, B. Bussel, and B. H. Dobkin
An Accelerometry-Based Comparison of 2 Robotic Assistive Devices for Treadmill Training of Gait
Neurorehabil Neural Repair,
July 1, 2008;
22(4):
348 - 354.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. Manganotti, M. Acler, G. P. Zanette, N. Smania, and A. Fiaschi
Motor Cortical Disinhibition During Early and Late Recovery After Stroke
Neurorehabil Neural Repair,
July 1, 2008;
22(4):
396 - 403.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. H. Dobkin
Fatigue Versus Activity-Dependent Fatigability in Patients With Central or Peripheral Motor Impairments
Neurorehabil Neural Repair,
April 1, 2008;
22(2):
105 - 110.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. F. Wittenberg, E. P. Bastings, A. M. Fowlkes, T. M. Morgan, D. C. Good, and T. P. Pons
Dynamic Course of Intracortical TMS Paired-Pulse Responses During Recovery of Motor Function After Stroke
Neurorehabil Neural Repair,
December 1, 2007;
21(6):
568 - 573.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. L. Wolf, C. J. Winstein, J. P. Miller, S. Blanton, P. C. Clark, and D. Nichols-Larsen
Looking in the Rear View Mirror When Conversing With Back Seat Drivers: The EXCITE Trial Revisited
Neurorehabil Neural Repair,
October 1, 2007;
21(5):
379 - 387.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Brandt
Motor and Functional Recovery After Stroke: A Comparison Between 4 European Rehabilitation Centers
Stroke,
July 1, 2007;
38(7):
2030 - 2031.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|
|