|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, Vol. 21, No. 1,
25-35 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/1545968306295556
The Evolution of Walking-Related Outcomes Over the First 12 Weeks of Rehabilitation for Incomplete Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury: The Multicenter Randomized Spinal Cord Injury Locomotor Trial
B. Dobkin, MD
Department of Neurology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, bdobkin{at}mednet.ucla.edu
H. Barbeau, PhD
McGill University/Institut de Readaptation de Montreal, Montreal, Canada
D. Deforge, MD
University of Ottawa Rehabilitation Hospital, Ottawa, Canada
J. Ditunno, MD
Magee Rehabilitation Center/Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
R. Elashoff, PhD
Department of Biomathematics, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA
D. Apple, MD
Shepherd Rehabilitation Center, Atlanta, GA
M. Basso, EdD
Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Ohio State Univeristy, Columbus, OH
A. Behrman, PhD
University of Florida, Department of Physical Therapy, Gainesville, FL
L. Fugate
S. Harkema, PhD
Department of Neurosurgery, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky
M. Saulino, MD
Magee Rehabilitation Center/Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
M. Scott, MD
Rancho Los Amigos National Rehabilitation Center, Downey, CA
the Spinal Cord Injury Locomotor Trial Group
Background. The Spinal Cord Injury Locomotor Trial (SCILT) compared 12 weeks of step training with body weight support on a treadmill (BWSTT) that included overground practice to a defined but more conventional overground mobility intervention (CONT) in patients with incomplete traumatic SCI within 8 weeks of onset. No previous studies have reported walking-related outcomes during rehabilitation.
Methods. This single-blinded, randomized trial entered 107 American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) C and D patients and 38 ASIA B patients with lesions between C5 and L3 who were unable to walk on admission for rehabilitation. The Functional Independence Measure (FIM-L) for walking, 15-m walking speed, and lower extremity motor score (LEMS) were collected every 2 weeks.
Results. No significant differences were found at entry and during the treatment phase (12-week mean FIM-L = 5, velocity = 0.8 m/s, LEMS = 35, distance walked in 6 min = 250 m). Combining the 2 arms, a FIM-L  4 was achieved in < 10% of ASIA B patients, 92% of ASIA C patients, and all of ASIA D patients. Walking speed of 0.6 m/s correlated with a LEMS near 40 or higher.
Conclusions. Few ASIA B and most ASIA C and D patients achieved functional walking ability by the end of 12 weeks of BWSTT and CONT, consistent with the primary outcome data at 6 months. Walking-related measures assessed at 2-week intervals reveal that time after SCI is an important variable for entering patients into a trial with mobility outcomes. By about 6 weeks after entry, most patients who will recover have improved their FIM-L to >3 and are improving in walking speed. Future trials may reduce the number needed to treat by entering patients with FIM-L < 4 at > 8 weeks after onset if still graded ASIA B and at > 12 weeks if still ASIA C.
Key Words: Spinal cord injury • Rehabilitation • Walking outcomes • Treadmill training • Locomotion
References
- Dobkin B. The Clinical Science of Neurologic Rehabilitation. New York: Oxford University Press; 2003.
- Barbeau H, McCrea D, O’Donovan M, et al. Tapping into spinal circuits to restore motor function. Brain Res Rev. 1999;30: 27-51.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- de Leon R, Hodgson J, Roy R, et al. Locomotor capacity attributable to step training versus spontaneous recovery after spinalization in adult cats. J Neurophysiol. 1998;79: 1329-1340.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Barbeau H, Nadeau S, Garneau C. Physical determinants, emerging concepts and training approaches in gait of individuals with spinal cord injury. J Neurotrauma. 2006;23: 571-585.[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Dobkin B. Overview of treadmill locomotor training with partial body weight support: a neurophysiologically sound approach whose time has come for randomized clinical trials. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 1999;13: 157-165.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Wernig A, Muller S, Nanassy A, et al. Laufband therapy based on "Rules of Spinal Locomotion" is effective in spinal cord injured persons. Euro J Neurosci. 1995;7: 823-829.[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Dobkin B, Harkema S, Requejo P, et al. Modulation of locomotor-like EMG activity in subjects with complete and incomplete chronic spinal cord injury. J Neurol Rehabil. 1995;9: 183-190.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Dietz V, Wirz M, Curt A, et al. Locomotor patterns in paraplegic patients: training effects and recovery of spinal cord function. Spinal Cord. 1998;36: 380-390.[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Harkema S, Hurley S, Patel U, et al. Human lumbosacral spinal cord interprets loading during stepping. J Neurophysiol. 1997;77: 797-811.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Nymark J, DeForge D, Barbeau H, et al. Body weight support treadmill gait training in the subacute recovery phase of incomplete spinal cord injury. J Neuro Rehabil. 1998;12: 119-138.
- Dietz V, Duysens J. Significance of load receptor input during locomotion: a review. Posture Gait. 2000;11: 102-110.[CrossRef]
- Dobkin B, Apple D, Barbeau H, et al. Methods for a randomized trial of weight-supported treadmill training versus conventional training for walking during inpatient rehabilitation after incomplete traumatic spinal cord injury. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2003;17: 153-167.[Abstract]
- Dobkin BH, Apple D, Barbeau H, et al. Weight-supported tread-mill vs over-ground training for walking after acute incomplete SCI. Neurology. 2006;66: 484-493.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Dobkin BH. Short-distance walking speed and timed walking distance: redundant measures for clinical trials? Neurology. 2006;66: 584-586.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Pohl P, Perera S, Duncan P, et al. Gains in distance walking in a 3- month follow-up poststroke: what changes? Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2004;18: 30-36.[Abstract]
- Burns S, Golding D, Rolle W, et al. Recovery of ambulation in motor-incomplete tetraplegia. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1997;78: 1169-1172.[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Geisler F, Coleman W, Grieco G, et al. Measurements and recovery patterns in a multicenter study of acute spinal cord injury. Spine. 2001;26: S68-S86.[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Waters R, Adkins R, Yakura J, Sie I. Motor and sensory recovery following incomplete paraplegia. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1994; 75: 67-72.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Waters R, Adkins R, Yakura J, Sie I. Motor and sensory recovery following incomplete tetraplegia. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1994; 75: 306-311.[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Dobkin B, Havton L. Basic advances and new avenues in therapy of spinal cord injury. Annu Rev Med. 2004;55: 255-282.[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Dobkin BH, Curt A, Guest J. Cellular transplants in China: observational study from the largest human experiment in chronic spinal cord injury. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2006; 20(1): 5-13.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Marino R, Ditunno J, Donovan W, et al. Neurologic recovery after traumatic spinal cord injury: data from the model spinal cord injury systems. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1999;80: 1391-1396.[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Dobkin BH. Rehabilitation and functional neuroimaging dose-response trajectories for clinical trials. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2005;19: 276-282.[Abstract]
- Vaynman S, Gomez-Pinilla F. License to run: exercise impacts functional plasticity in the intact and injured CNS by using neurotrophins. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2005;19: 283-295.[Abstract]
- Waters R, Adkins R, Yakura J, et al. Prediction of ambulatory performance based on motor scores derived from standards of the American Spinal Injury Association. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1994;75: 756-760.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Kirshblum SC, O’Connor KC. Predicting neurologic recovery in traumatic cervical spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1998;79: 1456-1466.[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Geisler F, Coleman W, Grieco G, et al. The Sygen multicenter acute spinal cord injury study. Spine. 2001;26: S87-S98.[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Steeves J, Lammertse D, Curt A, et al. Guidelines for the conduct of clinical trials for spinal cord injury as developed by the ICCP panel. Spine. 2006; in press.
- Barbeau H. Locomotor training in neurorehabilitation: emerging rehabilitation concepts. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2003;17: 3-11.[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Steeves JD, Fawcett J, Tuszynski M. Report of international clinical trials workshop on spinal cord injury, February 2004. Spinal Cord. 2004;42: 591-597.[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Winchester P, McColl R, Querry R, et al. Changes in supraspinal activation patterns following robotic locomotor therapy in motor-incomplete spinal cord injury. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2005; 19: 313-324.[Abstract]
 CiteULike  Connotea  Del.icio.us  Digg  Reddit  Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
|
|
 
J.-P. Regnaux, K. Saremi, J. Marehbian, B. Bussel, and B. H. Dobkin
An Accelerometry-Based Comparison of 2 Robotic Assistive Devices for Treadmill Training of Gait
Neurorehabil Neural Repair,
July 1, 2008;
22(4):
348 - 354.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
P.J. Wrigley, S.M. Gustin, P.M. Macey, P.G. Nash, S.C. Gandevia, V.G. Macefield, P.J. Siddall, and L.A. Henderson
Anatomical Changes in Human Motor Cortex and Motor Pathways following Complete Thoracic Spinal Cord Injury
Cereb Cortex,
May 14, 2008;
(2008)
bhn072v1.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. H. Dobkin
Fatigue Versus Activity-Dependent Fatigability in Patients With Central or Peripheral Motor Impairments
Neurorehabil Neural Repair,
April 1, 2008;
22(2):
105 - 110.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. F. Ditunno Jr, H. Barbeau, B. H. Dobkin, R. Elashoff, S. Harkema, R. J. Marino, W. W. Hauck, D. Apple, D. M. Basso, A. Behrman, et al.
Validity of the Walking Scale for Spinal Cord Injury and Other Domains of Function in a Multicenter Clinical Trial
Neurorehabil Neural Repair,
December 1, 2007;
21(6):
539 - 550.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. Rossignol, M. Schwab, M. Schwartz, and M. G. Fehlings
Spinal Cord Injury: Time to Move?
J. Neurosci.,
October 31, 2007;
27(44):
11782 - 11792.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. L. Wolf, C. J. Winstein, J. P. Miller, S. Blanton, P. C. Clark, and D. Nichols-Larsen
Looking in the Rear View Mirror When Conversing With Back Seat Drivers: The EXCITE Trial Revisited
Neurorehabil Neural Repair,
October 1, 2007;
21(5):
379 - 387.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. S. Hosalkar, S. Reddy, C. Mariani, and M. Ann Keenan
What's new in orthopaedic rehabilitation.
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
October 1, 2007;
89(10):
2316 - 2324.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. A Prosser
Locomotor Training Within an Inpatient Rehabilitation Program After Pediatric Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury
Physical Therapy,
September 1, 2007;
87(9):
1224 - 1232.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. Barbeau, R. Elashoff, D. Deforge, J. Ditunno, M. Saulino, and B.H. Dobkin
Comparison of Speeds Used for the 15.2-Meter and 6-Minute Walks Over the Year After an Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury: The SCILT Trial
Neurorehabil Neural Repair,
July 1, 2007;
21(4):
302 - 306.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. H. Dobkin
Confounders in Rehabilitation Trials of Task-Oriented Training: Lessons From the Designs of the EXCITE and SCILT Multicenter Trials
Neurorehabil Neural Repair,
January 1, 2007;
21(1):
3 - 13.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
