This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Gelber, D. A. Articles by Verhulst, S. J. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Gelber, D. A. Articles by Verhulst, S. J. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Comparison of Two Therapy Approaches in the Rehabilitation of the Pure Motor Hemiparetic Stroke Patient

Department of Neurology Southern Illinois University School of Medicine, Springfield, Illinois

B. Josefczyk, M.D.

Department of Neurology Southern Illinois University School of Medicine, Springfield, Illinois

Denyse Herrman, P.T., M.S.

Department of Neurology Southern Illinois University School of Medicine, Springfield, Illinois

David C. Good, M.D.

Department of Statistics and Research Consulting, Southern Illinois University School of Medicine, Springfield, Illinois

Steven J. Verhulst, Ph.D.

Although there are a variety of therapeutic philosophies applied in stroke rehabilitation, it has not been determined whether one approach is superior to another. We prospectively evaluated twenty-seven patients with pure motor hemiparetic strokes admitted to an acute neurorehabilitation unit and randomized them to treatment with either a traditional functional retraining approach (TFR) or neurodevelopmental techniques (NDT). NDT and TFR treated patients did not differ with regard to age, gender, side of stroke, or days from stroke to study entry. Other than an increased gait velocity in NDT treated patients at hospital discharge (p = 0.04), there was no significant difference in gait measures, upper extremity motor skills, or Functional Independence Measure (FIM) scores at hospital discharge, six month, or twelve month follow-up. Rehab length of stay did not differ significantly between the two treatment groups. This data suggests that TFR and NDT approaches are equally efficacious in treating pure motor hemiparetic strokes in terms of functional outcomes, gait measures, and upper extremity motor skills. Key Words: Stroke—Rehabilitation—Physical therapy— Neurodevelopmental technique.

Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, Vol. 9, No. 4, 191-196 (1995)
DOI: 10.1177/154596839500900401


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?