This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Chan, A. Articles by Theriot, K. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Chan, A. Articles by Theriot, K. Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Balance and Spasticity: What We Know and What We Believe

Multiple Sclerosis Clinic, St., Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Cinda Hugos

Oregon Health Sciences University, Portland, Oregon

Sarah Morrison

Shepherd Spinal Center, Atlanta, Georgia

Karen Theriot

Director of Rehabilitation Services, Rocky Mountain Multiple Sclerosis Center, Englewood, Colorado

In September 1992, the Executive Committee of the Consortium of Multiple Sclerosis Centers selected members for the physical therapy specialty panel. The group's responsibility was to review current literature and clinical practice on spasticity and balance in multiple sclerosis care. This task was achieved through individual work and conference calls and the results were reported at the multidisciplinary "What Do We Know About MS?" conference in June 1993. With input from forty other health care professionals experienced with MS care, two research questions were generated by the physical therapy panel. The question for balance was "Which of the three clinical measurement tools—Tinetti, Berg, or Functional Reach—is the best predictor of falls in the MS client, and how do they correlate with an experienced clinician's subjective evaluation?" The question for spasticity was "Will a daily stretching program result in decreased spasticity severity and improved functional mobility in ambulatory MS clients?" The findings from the spasticity question will provide a scientific basis for a common clinical practice in MS. The findings from the balance question will validate reliable clinical tools that may assess risk for falling in MS clients. The experience and findings were shared at the annual Consortium meeting in Victoria in September 1993.

Key Words: Physical therapy • Multiple sclerosis • Spasticity • Balance • Measurement • Multidisciplinary.

Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, Vol. 8, No. 3, 119-130 (1994)
DOI: 10.1177/136140969400800305


CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?