This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Marsolais, E. B. Articles by Jacobs, J. L. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Marsolais, E. B. Articles by Jacobs, J. L. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Orthoses and Electrical Stimulation for Walking in Complete Paraplegia

Veterans Administration Medial Center, 10701 East Houlevard 15 IW, Cleveland, OH 44106.

Rudi Kobetic

Howard J. Chizeck

Janis L. Jacobs

Orthotic systems, orthoses combined with functional neuromuscular stimulation (FNS), and FNS systems alone, are compared for their safety, function, and ease of use as walking systems for people with complete paraplegia. Despite the safety and joint protection offered by orthoses, the majority of paraplegics with lesions above the T-1 2 level discard braces at the termination of the rehabilitation period. Reasons include the limited function provided, poor cosmetic appearance, and high energy cost of use. Conventional bracing has been combined with FNS to facilitate the swing phase of gait, but the disadvantages of braces are still present; the advantage of slightly reduced energy cost with FNS is offset by the drawback of increased complexity. Trials of both surface and percutaneous FNS systems have demonstrated that FNS walking for paraplegics is feasible in the research environment. While pure FNS systems eliminate the disadvantages of bracing, they have the requirements of complex electrode application in the case of surface systems, or care of electrode skin sites and connections in the case of percutaneous systems. Additional problems of FNS systems are a high energy cost and lack of trunk and hip stability, requiring the use of a walker. The authors are addressing these problems through the development of closed-loop control of stimulation to utilize muscles in more normal on/off cycles and in the development of totally implanted systems to increase reliability and convenience.

Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, Vol. 5, No. 1-2, 13-22 (1991)
DOI: 10.1177/136140969100500103


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?