SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Goldstein, L. B.
Right arrow Articles by Davis, J. N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Goldstein, L. B.
Right arrow Articles by Davis, J. N.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Influence of Drugs on the Recovery of Sensorimotor Function After Stroke

Larry B. Goldstein

Department of Medicine Neurology, Duke University, Center for Health Policy Research & Education, Duke University, and Durham Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Durham, NC, U.S.A.

David B. Matchar

Department of Medicine General Medicine, Duke University, Center for Health Policy Research & Education, Duke University, and Durham Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Durham, NC, U.S.A.

Joel C. Morgenlander

Department of Medicine Neurology, Duke University

James N. Davis

Department of Medicine Neurology, Duke University, Departemnt of Medicine Neurobiology and Pharmacology, Duke University

Patients who are at risk for cerebrovascular disease and those who have had a recent ischemic stroke are treated with a variety of drugs. Some of these drugs impair recovery of function after experimental focal brain injury in laboratory animals. In order to test the hypothesis that these drugs may also have detrimental effects in man and to determine the feasibility of a prospective study, a retrospective analysis of 58 patients with carotid distribution strokes who were enrolled in a prospective cohort study of stroke outcome were analyzed. Sensorimotor function was measured by observers blind to the study hypothesis shortly after stroke and again 5 and 30 days later with the Fugl-Meyer assessment. Independence in activities of daily living was measured with the Barthel Index. Patients were subsequently divided into two groups based on the drugs received either immediately before the onset of neurologic symptoms or during the subsequent hospitalization. Patients receiving phenytoin, benzodiazepines (triazolam, chlodiazepoxide, or alprazolam), neuroleptics (chlorpromazine,prochlorperazine,orhaloperidol), or the antihypertensive drugs, clonidine or prazosin, constituted the "detrimental drug" group (n = 24). Patients receiving other medications formed the "neutral drug" group (n = 34). The two groups of patients were similar with respect to stroke risk factors, prognostic factors, and initial functional deficits. Compared to patients in the "neutral drug" group, patients in the "detrimental drug" group had poorer sensorimotor function (Mann-Whitney U = 157, Z = -2.04; p = 0.04) and were less independent in activities of daily living (Mann-Whitney U = 139, Z = -2.368; p = 0.02) 30 days after the stroke. "Detrimental drug" group patients also had slower overall 30-day recoveries (Mann-Whitney U = 154, Z = -2.89; p = 0.004). A secondary multivariate analysis indicated that the calculated recovery rate was significantly related to the patient's initial level of consciousness, initial Fugl-Meyer score, study drug group, and race (i.e., the overall 30-day recovery was significantly related to study drug group independent of the severity of the initial deficit). These data are consistent with the hypothesis that specific drugs taken by patients with cerebral infarction may influence their subsequent functional recoveries. Until the emerging pharmacology of functional recovery is better understood, care should be taken in the selection of drugs used in the treatment of patients with cerebrovascular disease. Key Words: Stroke—Cerebral infarction—Functional recovery—Rehabilitation—Drugs—Fugl—Meyer assessment.

Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, Vol. 4, No. 3, 137-144 (1990)
DOI: 10.1177/136140969000400303


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




Advertisement