SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lee, K.-C.
Right arrow Articles by Patterson, V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Lee, K.-C.
Right arrow Articles by Patterson, V.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Ashworth Scale: A Reliable and Reproducible Method of Measuring Spasticity

Kui-Chung Lee

Lynn Carson

Elma Kinnin

Victor Patterson

Spasticity is an important cause of neurological disability, and many new treatments are emerging to treat it. To assess any therapy, a consistent and reproducible method of measuring spasticity is required. The Ashworth Scale, in which each passive movement is graded between 1 (normal) and 5 (immovable), has been used in recent studies, and has the advantage over other methods of being simple to use and applicable over a wide range of arm and leg movements. We have studied the Ashworth Scale's reliability within and among four observers (two physicians, an occupational therapist, and a physical therapist) in 12 patients with moderate to severe spasticity. Total spasticity scores ranged from 22 to 66 (mean, 44.5). Coefficient of repeatability for intrarater variability was between 7.2 and 9.4. Interobserver error measured by Kendall's coefficient of concordance was 0.92. Given that small fluctuations in spasticity occur normally, these results indicate that the Ashworth Scale is a reliable and reproducible method of evaluating spasticity.

Key Words: Ashworth Scale • Spasticity measurement • Reliability.

Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, Vol. 3, No. 4, 205-209 (1989)
DOI: 10.1177/136140968900300406


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




Advertisement