SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Baribeau, J.
Right arrow Articles by Braun, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Baribeau, J.
Right arrow Articles by Braun, C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

A Neurophysiological Assessment of Selective Attention Before and After Cognitive Remediation in Patients with Severe Closed Head Injury

J. Baribeau

Department of Psychology, Concordia University

M. Ethier

Department of Psychology, Concordia University

C. Braun

Department of Psychology, University of Quebec at Montreal, Montreal, Canada

Auditory event-related potentials (ERPs) were recorded in a binaural listening task to assess neurophysiological correlates of selective attention before and after an intensive computer-dispensed cognitive remediation program (6 months) administered to 21 patients with severe closed head injuries (CHI). With a double-blind procedure, they were compared to a control group of 22 patients with CHI, matched for age (X = 28), sex, and education (X = 11 years), who did not receive cognitive remediation. Analyses of covariance were applied to control for coma duration (X = 57 days), posttrauma interval (X = 6.4 years), and severity of neuropsychological deficits. Error rates were not sensitive to treatment and speed of stimulation effects, but neurophysiological measures were. Distraction of both stimulus and response sets was manifested in all subjects (Ss) at pretest by relatively large P3a amplitudes to task-irrelevant tones at inattention and by an absence of attention modulation of N1 to task-relevant tones. Coma and severity of neuropsychological deficits correlated significantly with P3b amplitude, which indexes target discrimination and template-matching in short-term memory. All Ss improved capacity to follow instructions and efficiency of stimulus processing, as shown respectively by reduced N1 latencies at slow speed and increased P1-N1-P2 amplitudes at fast speed of stimulation at retest. Nd amplitudes at 200-ms latency also discriminated the treatment effect between the two groups, with the experimental group showing larger Nd-200 amplitude for the left ear after cognitive remediation. The pattern of modulations between ERP and Nd measures and between speed conditions at retest indicates that these modulations are not due to improved attentional selectivity but possibly to increased motivation or attentional effort and improved tonal stimulus processing after cognitive remediation.

Key Words: ERPs • —Nd • —Attention • —Remediation • —Head injury.

Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, Vol. 3, No. 2, 71-92 (1989)
DOI: 10.1177/136140968900300203


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




Advertisement