SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
1545968309332734v1
23/7/726    most recent
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stuart, M.
Right arrow Articles by Weinrich, M.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Stuart, M.
Right arrow Articles by Weinrich, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Community-Based Adaptive Physical Activity Program for Chronic Stroke: Feasibility, Safety, and Efficacy of the Empoli Model

Mary Stuart, ScD

Health Administration and Policy Program, University of Maryland, Baltimore County, Baltimore, Maryland, stuart{at}umbc.edu

Francesco Benvenuti, MD

Dipartimento della Riabilitazione e delle Fragilità, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale 11 di Empoli, Empoli, Italy

Richard Macko, MD

Department of Neurology and Medicine, Division of Gerontology, and Department of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Science, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland

Antonio Taviani, MD

Dipartimento della Riabilitazione e delle Fragilità, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale 11 di Empoli, Empoli, Italy

Lucianna Segenni, MD

Unità Operativa di Recupero e Riabilitazione Funzionale, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale 5 di Pisa, Pisa, Italy

Federico Mayer, MD

Unità Operativa di Riabilitazione, Casa di Cura Ulivella e Glicini, Firenze, Italy

John D. Sorkin, MD, PhD

University of Maryland School of Medicine, Claude D. Pepper Older Americans Independence Center, Baltimore, Maryland

Steven J. Stanhope, PhD

Department of Health, Nutrition, and Exercise Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware

Velio Macellari, PhD

Dipartimento Tecnologie e Salute, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Roma, Italy

Michael Weinrich, MD

National Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research, NICHD, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland

Objective. To determine whether Adaptive Physical Activity (APA-stroke), a community-based exercise program for participants with hemiparetic stroke, improves function in the community. Methods. Nonrandomized controlled study in Tuscany, Italy, of participants with mild to moderate hemiparesis at least 9 months after stroke. Forty-nine participants in a geographic health authority (Empoli) were offered APA-stroke (40 completed the study). Forty-four control participants in neighboring health authorities (Florence and Pisa) received usual care (38 completed the study). The APA intervention was a community-based progressive group exercise regimen that included walking, strength, and balance training for 1 hour, thrice a week, in local gyms, supervised by gym instructors. No serious adverse clinical events occurred during the exercise intervention. Outcome measures included the following: 6-month change in gait velocity (6-Minute Timed Walk), Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB), Berg Balance Scale, Stroke Impact Scale (SIS), Barthel Index, Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression, and Index of Caregivers Strain. Results. After 6 months, the intervention group improved whereas controls declined in gait velocity, balance, SPPB, and SIS social participation domains. These between-group comparisons were statistically significant at P < .00015. Individuals with depressive symptoms at baseline improved whereas controls were unchanged (P < .003). Oral glucose tolerance tests were performed on a subset of participants in the intervention group. For these individuals, insulin secretion declined 29% after 6 months (P = .01). Conclusion. APA-stroke appears to be safe, feasible, and efficacious in a community setting.

Key Words: Stroke • Exercise • Community • Rehabilitation

This version was published on September 1, 2009

Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, Vol. 23, No. 7, 726-734 (2009)
DOI: 10.1177/1545968309332734


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




Advertisement