This Article Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 1545968308328732v1 23/6/529    most recent References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Reisman, D. S. Articles by Farquhar, W. B. PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Reisman, D. S. Articles by Farquhar, W. B. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Influence of Speed on Walking Economy Poststroke

Department of Physical Therapy, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware, dreisman{at}udel.edu, Interdisciplinary Program in Biomechanics and Movement Science, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware

Katherine S. Rudolph, PhD, PT

Department of Physical Therapy, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware, Interdisciplinary Program in Biomechanics and Movement Science, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware

William B. Farquhar, PhD

Interdisciplinary Program in Biomechanics and Movement Science, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware, Department of Health, Nutrition and Exercise Science, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware

Background and Objective. Walking speed influences energy cost in healthy adults, but its influence when walking is impaired due to stroke is not clear. This study investigated the effect of manipulating walking speed on the energy economy of walking poststroke. Methods. Sixteen persons with chronic stroke underwent a clinical examination, including several lower extremity impairment measures. consumption (VO₂) was measured as they walked at their self-selected speed (Free), 20% slower (Slow), their fastest possible speed (Fastest), and 2 speeds between Free and Fastest speeds. VO₂ was normalized to body mass and speed, resulting in energy cost per meter walked (CW). Results. A main effect for speed was observed (P = .00001), with faster than self-selected speeds showing greater relative economy as a whole. However, for 5 subjects with the fastest walking speeds (>1.2 m/s), there was a trend toward decreasing relative economy at speeds higher than self-selected speed (P = .18). There was a negative correlation between improvement in CW at the most economical speed and (a) Free speed (r = –.857; P < .0001) and (b) lower extremity Fugl-Meyer scores (r = –.653; P = .006). Conclusions. For those poststroke whose fastest walking speed after stroke is below 1.2 m/s, walking economy improves when speed is increased above the self-selected walking speed. The results suggest that for persons poststroke with very slow self-selected walking speeds, improvements in walking speed could be accompanied by improvements in walking economy if faster walking speeds can be attained through intervention.

Key Words: Stroke • Walking • Energy • Speed

This version was published on July 1, 2009

Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, Vol. 23, No. 6, 529-534 (2009)
DOI: 10.1177/1545968308328732


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?