This Article Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 1545968308331146v1 23/5/435    most recent References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Chen, H.-M. Articles by Hsieh, C.-L. PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Chen, H.-M. Articles by Hsieh, C.-L. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Test-Retest Reproducibility and Smallest Real Difference of 5 Hand Function Tests in Patients With Stroke

School of Occupational Therapy, College of Health Science, Kaohsiung Medical University, Department of Rehabilitation, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan

Christine C. Chen, ScD, OTR/L

Programs in Occupational Therapy, Columbia University, New York, New York

I-Ping Hsueh, MS, OTR

School of Occupational Therapy, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Division of Occupational Therapy, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan

Sheau-Ling Huang, MS, OTR

School of Occupational Therapy, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Division of Occupational Therapy, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, cathy{at}ntu.edu.tw

Ching-Lin Hsieh, PhD, OTR

School of Occupational Therapy, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Division of Occupational Therapy, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan

Objective. To investigate the test-retest reproducibility and smallest real difference (SRD) of 3 hand strength tests (grip, palmar pinch, and lateral pinch) and 2 dexterity tests (the Box and Block test [BBT] and the Nine Hole Peg test [NHPT]) in patients with stroke. Methods. The 5 tests were administered on 62 stroke patients in 2 sessions, 3 to 7 days apart. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to determine the level of reproducibility between measurements on 2 sessions. The SRD was used to determine the extent of measurement error because of chance variation in individual patients. SRD percentage (SRD relative to mean score) was used to compare test-retest reliability across tests. We analyzed the group as a whole, then in 2 subgroups (hand spasticity vs none). Results. The test-retest reproducibility of all 5 tests was high for all the patients, with ICCs ranging from 0.85 to 0.98. The SRDs for the more/less affected hand were: 2.9/4.7 kg for the grip test; 1.2/1.3 kg for the palmar pinch test; 1.4/1.0 kg for the lateral pinch test; 5.5/7.8 blocks/minute for the BBT; and 32.8/6.2 seconds for the NHPT. Unacceptably high SRD percentages (>30%) were found for the affected hand using the NHPT (54%), palmar pinch (35%), and lateral pinch (34%). When comparing these indices for participants with spasticity versus none for all 5 tests, the ICCs were lower and the SRD and SRD percentage were higher for the spasticity group. Conclusions. All 5 tests demonstrated satisfactory test-retest reproducibility for a diverse group of patients with stroke. However, all tests showed higher levels of measurement error when performed with the more affected hand and in patients with hypertonicity of that hand. Thus, baseline and postrehabilitation change scores using these common tests of strength and dexterity must be interpreted with some caution, especially in poorly controlled clinical trials. Repeated measures ought to be incorporated to examine reliability within a trial that includes participants with a hypertonic hand.

Key Words: Hand strength • Measurement • Stroke rehabilitation • Reliability

This version was published on June 1, 2009

Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, Vol. 23, No. 5, 435-440 (2009)
DOI: 10.1177/1545968308331146


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?