This Article Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 1545968308331143v1 23/5/413    most recent References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Rudhe, C. Articles by van Hedel, H. J. A. PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Rudhe, C. Articles by van Hedel, H. J. A. Pubmed/NCBI databases Medline Plus Health Information Arm Injuries and Disorders Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Upper Extremity Function in Persons with Tetraplegia: Relationships Between Strength, Capacity, and the Spinal Cord Independence Measure

The GRASSP Study Group (Graded Redefined Assessment of Strength, Sensibility, and Prehension), EM-SCI Study Group (European Multicenter Study on Human Spinal Cord Injury), Spinal Cord Injury Center, Balgrist University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland

Hubertus J. A. van Hedel, PT, PhD

Spinal Cord Injury Center, Balgrist University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland, hvanhedel{at}paralab.balgrist.ch, EM-SCI Study Group (European Multicenter Study on Human Spinal Cord Injury)

Objective. To quantify the relationship between the Spinal Cord Independence Measure III (SCIM III), arm and hand muscle strength, and hand function tests in persons with tetraplegia. Methods. A total of 29 individuals with tetraplegia (motor level between cervical 4 and thoracic 1; sensory-motor complete and incomplete) participated. The total score, category scores, and separate items of the SCIM III were compared to the upper extremity motor score (UEMS), an extended manual muscle test (MMT) for 11 upper extremity muscles, and 6 functional capacity tests of the hand. Spearman's correlation coefficients (r_s) and regression analyses were performed. Results. The SCIM III sum score correlated well with the sum scores of the 3 tests (r_s .76). The SCIM III self-care category correlated better with the tests ( r_s .80) compared to the other categories (r _s .72). The SCIM III self-care item "grooming" highly correlated with muscle strength and hand capacity items (r_s .80). A combination of hand muscle tests and the key grasping task explained over 90% of the variability in the self-care category scores. Conclusions. The SCIM III self-care category reflects upper extremity performance as it contains especially useful and valid items that relate to upper extremity function and capacity tests.

Key Words: Spinal cord injury • Upper extremity • Rehabilitation • Activities of daily living • Motor control

This version was published on June 1, 2009

Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, Vol. 23, No. 5, 413-421 (2009)
DOI: 10.1177/1545968308331143


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?