SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
1545968308321778v1
23/3/287    most recent
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sorinola, I. O.
Right arrow Articles by Newham, D. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sorinola, I. O.
Right arrow Articles by Newham, D. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Electromyographic Response to Manual Passive Stretch of the Hemiplegic Wrist: Accuracy, Reliability, and Correlation With Clinical Spasticity Assessment and Function

Isaac O. Sorinola, PhD

Division of Applied Biomedical Research, School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, King's College, London

Claire M. White, PhD

Division of Applied Biomedical Research, School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, King's College, London

David N. Rushton, FRCP

Academic Department of Rehabilitation, King's College Hospital, London

Dianne J. Newham, PhD

Division of Applied Biomedical Research, School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, King's College, London, di.newham{at}kcl.ac.uk

Background. The management of spasticity is important in neurorehabilitation and needs to be assessed accurately. The commonly used clinical tools have been criticized for lack of validity and sensitivity. Objective. To investigate the reliability of electromyographic (EMG) response to manual stretches of the hemiplegic wrist and its correlation with clinical assessments of spasticity and physical function. Methods. EMG activity was measured in 10 stroke patients and control participants (53.7 ± 10 and 32 ± 9.1 years respectively, mean ± SEM) during 3 cycles of 10 seconds passive manual movements of the wrist at 60 to 360° • s-1. Isometric maximal voluntary contractions (MVC) strength, range of movement (ROM) of the wrist flexors and extensors, spasticity (Modified Ashworth Scale [MAS]) and hand function (Block and Box Test [BBT]) were also assessed. Results. EMG activity of the stroke patients increased with velocity from 4% to 40% MVC (P < .001) but there was none in the controls. It was unaffected by repetition and good to moderate reliability occurred at all speeds (ICC, 0.71-0.81). EMG correlated negatively with MVC strength (r = -.9), active wrist flexion ROM ( r = -.8), and hand function scores (r = —.7), but not with clinical measures of spasticity except at the lowest velocity (r = .72). Conclusions. Consistent and accurate stretch velocities and EMG responses can be achieved with manual wrist stretches for the assessment of the neural component of spasticity. These objective tests did not correlate well with the standard clinical assessment of spasticity. They showed significant negative relationships with function, indicating that increased reflex excitability contributes to hand disability after stroke.

Key Words: Spasticity • Stroke • Electromyography • Reliability • Function

This version was published on March 1, 2009

Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, Vol. 23, No. 3, 287-294 (2009)
DOI: 10.1177/1545968308321778


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




Advertisement