This Article Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 1545968308324226v1 23/3/275    most recent References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Rijntjes, M. Articles by Weiller, C. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Rijntjes, M. Articles by Weiller, C. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Repeat Therapy for Chronic Motor Stroke: A Pilot Study for Feasibility and Efficacy

Department of Neurology, University Clinic Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany, michel.rijntjes{at}uniklinik-freiburg.de

Kerstin Haevernick

Department of Physiotherapy, University Clinic Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany

Anne Barzel, MD

Department of General Medicine, University Clinic Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany

Hendrik van den Bussche, MD

Department of General Medicine, University Clinic Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany

Gesche Ketels

Department of Physiotherapy, University Clinic Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany

Cornelius Weiller, MD

Department of Neurology, University Clinic Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany

Background. Therapeutic interventions improve outcomes in the acute and chronic phase after motor stroke, but a significant amount of this improvement is usually lost after more than 1 year. Patients might profit from a second course of intensive physiotherapy, but this has not been investigated. Objective. The feasibility and effect of a second phase of physiotherapy was examined 2 years after the first one. Methods. A total of 12 patients with chronic stroke were instructed to wear a constraining splint on the affected elbow and hand while awake for 4 weeks and practice individually tailored tasks 2 hours per day. Motor tests for assessment included the Motor Activity Log, Wolf Motor Function Test, and 9-Hole Peg Test. Results. In the 11 patients who were available for postintervention assessment, the deterioration in the amount and quality of movement that had occurred since the first therapy was largely recouped. Patients who wore the constraint more than 80% of waking hours during the second therapy showed a clear secondary improvement in all tests, in some surpassing the level reached after the first therapy. Conclusions. A repeated bout of home-based CIMT 2 years after initial training is feasible with relatively little time and effort provided by a therapist and can lead to further improvement.

Key Words: Stroke • Recovery • Constraint-induced movement therapy • Treatment outcome

This version was published on March 1, 2009

Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, Vol. 23, No. 3, 275-280 (2009)
DOI: 10.1177/1545968308324226


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. Clarke, H. Mala, V. Windle, G. Chernenko, and D. Corbett The Effects of Repeated Rehabilitation "Tune-Ups" on Functional Recovery After Focal Ischemia in Rats Neurorehabil Neural Repair, November 1, 2009; 23(9): 886 - 894. [Abstract] [PDF]