This Article Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 1545968308323928v1 23/3/267    most recent References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Roerdink, M. Articles by Beek, P. J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Roerdink, M. Articles by Beek, P. J. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

On the Relative Contribution of the Paretic Leg to the Control of Posture After Stroke

Research Institute MOVE, Faculty of Human Movement Sciences, VU University, Amsterdam, m.roerdink{at}fbw.vu.nl

Alexander C. H. Geurts, MD, PhD

Department of Rehabilitation, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, Nijmegen

Mirjam de Haart, MD, PhD

Department of Rehabilitation, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam The Netherlands

Peter J. Beek, PhD

Research Institute MOVE, Faculty of Human Movement Sciences, VU University, Amsterdam

Background. Reduced postural steadiness and asymmetry of weight bearing are characteristic for posture after stroke. Objective. To examine the relative contribution of each leg to postural control in a cohort of 33 stroke patients at 5 stages during 3 months of inpatient rehabilitation, while taking clinical scores of sensory and motor impairments of the paretic leg into account. Methods. Participants were instructed to stand as symmetrically as possible under both sensory and cognitive manipulations, while a dual-plate force platform was used to assess the contribution of each leg to postural control, quantified by the amplitude, velocity, and regularity of recorded center-of-pressure trajectories. A greater contribution of the nonparetic leg was expected, particularly in patients with ankle clonus, disturbed sensibility, and lack of selective muscle control on the paretic side. Results. With follow-up assessments, weight-bearing asymmetry and postural steadiness improved. Patients strongly relied on visual information. When attention was distracted by having the patients perform an arithmetic task, weight-bearing asymmetry increased, suggesting that symmetric weight bearing was attention demanding. Patients with severe motor impairments of the paretic leg showed greater static (weight-bearing) and dynamic (lateralized control) asymmetries than patients with limited motor impairments, whereas postural steadiness did not differ between these subgroups. Disturbed sensation did not affect weight-bearing asymmetry, postural steadiness, or lateralized control. Conclusion. Patients with severe motor impairments of the paretic leg employ an effective compensatory strategy consisting of asymmetric weight bearing and lateralized control.

Key Words: Stroke • Rehabilitation • Control of posture • Attention • Balance • Hemiparesis

This version was published on March 1, 2009

Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, Vol. 23, No. 3, 267-274 (2009)
DOI: 10.1177/1545968308323928


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?