SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
1545968308317973v1
23/2/143    most recent
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Blicher, J. U.
Right arrow Articles by Nielsen, J. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Blicher, J. U.
Right arrow Articles by Nielsen, J. F.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Cortical and Spinal Excitability Changes After Robotic Gait Training in Healthy Participants

Jakob U. Blicher, MD

Hammel Neurorehabilitation and Research Centre, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark, neujbl{at}sc.aaa.dk

Jørgen F. Nielsen, MD

Hammel Neurorehabilitation and Research Centre, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark

Background. Recent studies have proposed a role for robotic gait training in participants with acquired brain injury, but the effects on the excitability of cortical and spinal neurons even in healthy participants are uncertain. Objective. To investigate changes in corticospinal excitability in healthy participants after active and passive robotic gait training in a driven gait orthosis (DGO), the Lokomat. Methods. Thirteen healthy participants took part in 2 experiments. Each participant performed 20 minutes of active and passive gait training in a DGO. Motor evoked potentials (MEP), short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI), intracortical facilitation (ICF), F-wave frequency, and Mmax were measured in the right tibialis anterior muscle before and after training. Results. Active training led to a decline in MEP amplitude and F-wave frequency. The MEP decline was associated with subjective muscle fatigue. Passive training induced a decrease in SICI lasting for 20 minutes after training. Conclusions. The decline in MEP after active training is most likely because of central fatigue, whereas the decreased F-wave frequency might represent short-term plastic changes in the spinal cord. The decrease in SICI after passive training probably reflects a decrease in intracortical GABA activity, which could benefit the acquisition of new motor skills.

Key Words: Transcranial magnetic stimulation • Intracortical inhibition • Human locomotion • Plasticity • Motor cortex • Spinal cord

This version was published on February 1, 2009

Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, Vol. 23, No. 2, 143-149 (2009)
DOI: 10.1177/1545968308317973


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Neurorehabil Neural RepairHome page
B. H. Dobkin
Progressive Staging of Pilot Studies to Improve Phase III Trials for Motor Interventions
Neurorehabil Neural Repair, March 1, 2009; 23(3): 197 - 206.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Advertisement