This Article Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 1545968308321067v1 23/2/133    most recent References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Thompson, A. K. Articles by Stein, R. B. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Thompson, A. K. Articles by Stein, R. B. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Spinal Reflexes in Ankle Flexor and Extensor Muscles After Chronic Central Nervous System Lesions and Functional Electrical Stimulation

Center for Neuroscience, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada, Helen Hayes Hospital, New York State Department of Health, West Haverstraw, New York

Kristen L. Estabrooks

Center for Neuroscience, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada

SuLing Chong

Center for Neuroscience, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada

Richard B. Stein, DPhil

Center for Neuroscience, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada, Department of Physiology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada, richard.stein{at}ualberta.ca

Objective. Spinal reciprocal inhibitory and excitatory reflexes of ankle extensor and flexor muscles were investigated in ambulatory participants with chronic central nervous system (CNS) lesions causing foot drop as a function of time after lesion and stimulator use. Methods. Thirty-nine participants with progressive (eg, secondary progressive MS) and 36 with generally nonprogressive (eg, stroke) conditions were studied. The tibialis anterior (TA) and soleus maximum H-reflex/M-wave (H_max/M_max) ratios and maximum voluntary contractions (MVC) were measured and compared with those in age-matched control participants. Reciprocal inhibition was measured as a depression of the ongoing electromyographic (EMG) activity produced by antagonist muscle—nerve stimulation. Results. Participants with CNS lesions had significantly higher soleus H_max/M_max ratios than control participants, and reduced voluntary modulation of the reflexes occurred in both muscles. Reciprocal inhibition of soleus from common peroneal (CP) nerve stimulation was not significantly different from controls in either group. Inhibition of the TA by tibial nerve stimulation decreased and was eventually replaced by excitation in participants with nonprogressive disorders. No significant change occurred in progressive disorders. Use of a foot drop stimulator increased the TA, but not the soleus MVC overall. H-reflexes only showed small changes. Reciprocal inhibition of the TA increased considerably, while that of the soleus muscle decreased toward control values. Conclusions. Disorders that produce foot drop also produce reflex changes, some of which only develop over a period of years or even decades. Regular use of a foot drop stimulator strengthens voluntary pathways and changes some reflexes toward control values. Thus, stimulators may provide multiple benefits to people with foot drop.

Key Words: Reciprocal inhibition • H-reflex • Foot drop • Stimulation

This version was published on February 1, 2009

Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, Vol. 23, No. 2, 133-142 (2009)
DOI: 10.1177/1545968308321067


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. J. Mottram, N. L. Suresh, C. J. Heckman, M. A. Gorassini, and W. Z. Rymer Origins of Abnormal Excitability in Biceps Brachii Motoneurons of Spastic-Paretic Stroke Survivors J Neurophysiol, October 1, 2009; 102(4): 2026 - 2038. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]