SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
1545968308318836v1
23/1/78    most recent
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Woodbury, M. L.
Right arrow Articles by Richards, L. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Woodbury, M. L.
Right arrow Articles by Richards, L. G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Effects of Trunk Restraint Combined With Intensive Task Practice on Poststroke Upper Extremity Reach and Function: A Pilot Study

Michelle L. Woodbury, PhD

Brain Rehabilitation Research Center, Malcom Randall Veterans Administration Medical Center; Department of Occupational Therapy, University of Florida, mwoodbur{at}phhp.ufl.edu

Dena R. Howland, PhD

Department of Neuroscience and McKnight Brain Institute, University of Florida; Research Service, Malcom Randall Veterans Administration Medical Center

Theresa E. McGuirk, MS

Brain Rehabilitation Research Center, Malcom Randall Veterans Administration Medical Center; Department of Physical Therapy, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida

Sandra B. Davis, MS

Brain Rehabilitation Research Center, Malcom Randall Veterans Administration Medical Center; Department of Physical Therapy, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida

Claudia R. Senesac, PhD

Brain Rehabilitation Research Center, Malcom Randall Veterans Administration Medical Center; Department of Physical Therapy, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida

Steve Kautz, PhD

Brain Rehabilitation Research Center, Malcom Randall Veterans Administration Medical Center; Department of Physical Therapy, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida

Lorie G. Richards, PhD

Brain Rehabilitation Research Center, Malcom Randall Veterans Administration Medical Center; Department of Occupational Therapy, University of Florida

Background. Poststroke reaching is characterized by excessive trunk motion and abnormal shoulder—elbow coordination. Little attention is typically given to arm—trunk kinematics during task practice. Preventing compensatory trunk motion during short-term practice immediately improves kinematics, but effects of longer-term practice are unknown. Objective. This study compared the effects of intensive task practice with and without trunk restraint on poststroke reaching kinematics and function. Methods. A total of 11 individuals with chronic stroke, baseline Fugl-Meyer Upper Extremity Assessment scores 26 to 54, were randomized to 2 constraint-therapy intervention groups. All participants wore a mitt on the unaffected hand for 90% of waking hours over 14 days and participated in 10 days/6 hours/day of supervised progressive task practice. During supervised sessions, one group trained with a trunk restraint (preventing anterior trunk motion) and one group did not. Tasks for the trunk-restraint group were located to afford repeated use of a shoulder flexion—elbow extension reaching pattern. Outcome measures included kinematics of unrestrained targeted reaching and tests of functional arm ability. Results. Posttraining, the trunk-restraint group demonstrated straighter reach trajectories (P = .000) and less trunk displacement (P = .001). The trunk-restraint group gained shoulder flexion (P = .006) and elbow extension (P = .022) voluntary ranges of motion, the nonrestraint group did not. Posttraining angle—angle plots illustrated that individuals from the trunk-restraint group transitioned from elbow flexion to elbow extension during mid-reach; individuals in the nonrestraint group retained pretraining movement strategies. Both groups gained functional arm ability (P < .05 all tests). Conclusion. Intensive task practice structured to prevent compensatory trunk movements and promote shoulder flexion—elbow extension coordination may reinforce development of "normal" reaching kinematics.

Key Words: Stroke • Rehabilitation • Upper extremity • Kinematics

This version was published on January 1, 2009

Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, Vol. 23, No. 1, 78-91 (2009)
DOI: 10.1177/1545968308318836


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




Advertisement