SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Thrasher, T. A.
Right arrow Articles by Popovic, M. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Thrasher, T. A.
Right arrow Articles by Popovic, M. R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Rehabilitation of Reaching and Grasping Function in Severe Hemiplegic Patients Using Functional Electrical Stimulation Therapy

T. Adam Thrasher, PhD

Department of Health & Human Performance, University of Houston, Houston, Texas, athrasher3{at}uh.edu

Vera Zivanovic, MD

Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

William McIlroy, PhD

Department of Kinesiology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada

Milos R. Popovic, PhD

Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, Institute of Biomaterials & Biomedical Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Objective. The aim of this study was to establish the efficacy of a therapeutic intervention based on functional electrical stimulation (FES) therapy to improve reaching and grasping function after severe hemiplegia due to stroke. Methods. A total of 21 subjects with acute stroke were randomized into 2 groups, FES plus conventional occupational and physiotherapy (FES group) or only conventional therapy (control group) 5 days a week for 12 to 16 weeks. A third group of 7 subjects with chronic hemiplegia (at least 5 months poststroke) received only FES therapy (chronic group) and pre—post training changes were compared. FES was applied to proximal and then distal muscle groups during specific motor tasks. At baseline and at the end of treatment, grasping function was assessed using the Rehabilitation Engineering Laboratory Hand Function Test, along with more standard measures of rehabilitation outcome. Results. The FES group improved significantly more than the control group in terms of object manipulation, palmar grip torque, pinch grip pulling force, Barthel Index, Upper Extremity Fugl—Meyer scores, and Upper Extremity Chedoke—McMaster Stages of Motor Recovery. The chronic stroke subjects demonstrated improvements in most categories, but the changes were not statistically significant. Conclusions. FES therapy with upper extremity training may be an efficacious intervention in the rehabilitation of reaching and grasping function during acute stroke rehabilitation.

Key Words: Hemiplegia • Rehabilitation • Grasping • Reaching • Functional electrical stimulation • Upper extremity

Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, Vol. 22, No. 6, 706-714 (2008)
DOI: 10.1177/1545968308317436


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Neurorehabil Neural RepairHome page
H.-M. Chen, C. C. Chen, I-P. Hsueh, S.-L. Huang, and C.-L. Hsieh
Test-Retest Reproducibility and Smallest Real Difference of 5 Hand Function Tests in Patients With Stroke
Neurorehabil Neural Repair, June 1, 2009; 23(5): 435 - 440.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Advertisement