This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Dickstein, R. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Dickstein, R. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Rehabilitation of Gait Speed After Stroke: A Critical Review of Intervention Approaches

Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Social Welfare and Health Sciences, University of Haifa, Mt Carmel, Haifa, Israel, ruthd{at}research.haifa.ac.il

Purpose. Walking speed is a cardinal indicator of poststroke gait performance; however, no consensus exists regarding the optimal treatment method(s) for its enhancement. The most widely accepted criterion for establishing the contribution of treatment to walking speed is the gain in speed. The actual speed, however, at the end of the intervention (final speed) may be more important for functional community ambulation. This review examines the contribution of the prevailing methods for gait rehabilitation to final walking speed. Method. Walking speed information was derived from studies included in meta-analyses, systematic reviews, and clinical practice guidelines. Recent references, not included in the mentioned sources, were incorporated in cases when gait speed was an outcome variable. Final speed was assessed by the reported speed values and by inferring the capacity for functional community walking at the end of the intervention period. Results. Similar outcomes for final walking speed were found for the different prevailing treatment methods. Treatment gains were likewise comparable and generally insufficient for upgrading patients' functional community walking capacity. Conclusions. Different treatment methods exist for poststroke gait rehabilitation. Their availability, mode of application, and costs vary, yet outcomes are largely similar. Therefore, choosing an appropriate method may be guided by a pragmatic approach. Simple "low technology" and conventional exercise to date is at least as efficacious as more complex strategies such as treadmill and robotic-based interventions.

Key Words: Stroke • Gait • Rehabilitation • Walking speed • Physical therapy.

Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, Vol. 22, No. 6, 649-660 (2008)
DOI: 10.1177/15459683080220060201


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. S. Reisman, R. Wityk, K. Silver, and A. J. Bastian Split-Belt Treadmill Adaptation Transfers to Overground Walking in Persons Poststroke Neurorehabil Neural Repair, September 1, 2009; 23(7): 735 - 744. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Stuart, F. Benvenuti, R. Macko, A. Taviani, L. Segenni, F. Mayer, J. D. Sorkin, S. J. Stanhope, V. Macellari, and M. Weinrich Community-Based Adaptive Physical Activity Program for Chronic Stroke: Feasibility, Safety, and Efficacy of the Empoli Model Neurorehabil Neural Repair, September 1, 2009; 23(7): 726 - 734. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. Song, B. E. Fisher, G. Petzinger, A. Wu, J. Gordon, and G. J. Salem The Relationships Between the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale and Lower Extremity Functional Performance in Persons With Early-Stage Parkinson's Disease Neurorehabil Neural Repair, September 1, 2009; 23(7): 657 - 661. [Abstract] [PDF]

				B. H. Dobkin Progressive Staging of Pilot Studies to Improve Phase III Trials for Motor Interventions Neurorehabil Neural Repair, March 1, 2009; 23(3): 197 - 206. [Abstract] [PDF]