SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sawaki, L.
Right arrow Articles by Wittenberg, G. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sawaki, L.
Right arrow Articles by Wittenberg, G. F.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy Results in Increased Motor Map Area in Subjects 3 to 9 Months After Stroke

Lumy Sawaki, MD, PhD

Department of Neurology, Program in Rehabilitation, Wake Forest University, Winston Salem, North Carolina, lumy.sawaki{at}uky.edu

Andrew J. Butler, PhD, MPT

Atlanta VAMC Rehabilitation R&D Center of Excellence in Rehabilitation of Aging Veterans with Vision Loss, Decatur, Georgia, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, School of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia

Xiaoyan Leng, MD, PhD

Department of Neurology, Program in Rehabilitation, Wake Forest University, Winston Salem, North Carolina

Peter A. Wassenaar, MS

Department of Radiology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, School of Allied Medical Professions, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio (PAW, DSN-L);

Yousef M. Mohammad, MD

Department of Neurology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio

Sarah Blanton, DPT, NCS

Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, School of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia

K. Sathian, MD, PhD

Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, Atlanta VAMC Rehabilitation R&D Center of Excellence in Rehabilitation of Aging Veterans with Vision Loss, Decatur, Georgia, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, School of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia

Deborah S. Nichols-Larsen, PhD, PT

School of Allied Medical Professions, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio (PAW, DSN-L);

Steven L. Wolf, PhD, PT, FAPTA

Atlanta VAMC Rehabilitation R&D Center of Excellence in Rehabilitation of Aging Veterans with Vision Loss, Decatur, Georgia, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, School of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, School of Allied Medical Professions, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio (PAW, DSN-L);

David C. Good, MD

Department of Neurology, Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania, Department of Neurology, Program in Rehabilitation, Wake Forest University, Winston Salem, North Carolina

George F. Wittenberg, MD, PhD

VAMHCS, Geriatrics Research, Education, and Clinical Center, Baltimore, Maryland, Department of Neurology, Program in Rehabilitation, Wake Forest University, Winston Salem, North Carolina

Background. Constraint-induced movement therapy (CIMT) has received considerable attention as an intervention to enhance motor recovery and cortical reorganization after stroke. Objective. The present study represents the first multi-center effort to measure cortical reorganization induced by CIMT in subjects who are in the subacute stage of recovery. Methods. A total of 30 stroke subjects in the subacute phase (>3 and <9 months poststroke) were recruited and randomized into experimental (receiving CIMT immediately after baseline evaluation) and control (receiving CIMT after 4 months) groups. Each subject was evaluated using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) at baseline, 2 weeks after baseline, and at 4-month follow-up (ie, after CIMT in the experimental groups and before CIMT in the control groups). The primary clinical outcome measure was the Wolf Motor Function Test. Results. Both experimental and control groups demonstrated improved hand motor function 2 weeks after baseline. The experimental group showed significantly greater improvement in grip force after the intervention and at follow-up (P = .049). After adjusting for the baseline measures, the experimental group had an increase in the TMS motor map area compared with the control group over a 4-month period; this increase was of borderline significance (P = .053). Conclusions. Among subjects who had a stroke within the previous 3 to 9 months, CIMT produced statistically significant and clinically relevant improvements in arm motor function that persisted for at least 4 months. The corresponding enlargement of TMS motor maps, similar to that found in earlier studies of chronic stroke subjects, appears to play an important role in CIMT-dependent plasticity.

Key Words: Plasticity • Recovery • Transcranial magnetic stimulation • Upper extremity.

Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, Vol. 22, No. 5, 505-513 (2008)
DOI: 10.1177/1545968308317531


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Neurorehabil Neural RepairHome page
J. Clarke, H. Mala, V. Windle, G. Chernenko, and D. Corbett
The Effects of Repeated Rehabilitation "Tune-Ups" on Functional Recovery After Focal Ischemia in Rats
Neurorehabil Neural Repair, November 1, 2009; 23(9): 886 - 894.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Neurorehabil Neural RepairHome page
M. D. Ellis, T. Sukal-Moulton, and J. P. A. Dewald
Progressive Shoulder Abduction Loading is a Crucial Element of Arm Rehabilitation in Chronic Stroke
Neurorehabil Neural Repair, October 1, 2009; 23(8): 862 - 869.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Neurorehabil Neural RepairHome page
V. Iyengar, M. J. Santos, M. Ko, and A. S. Aruin
Grip Force Control in Individuals With Multiple Sclerosis
Neurorehabil Neural Repair, October 1, 2009; 23(8): 855 - 861.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Neurorehabil Neural RepairHome page
B. H. Dobkin
Collaborative Models for Translational Neuroscience and Rehabilitation Research
Neurorehabil Neural Repair, September 1, 2009; 23(7): 633 - 640.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
ptjournalHome page
S. L. Wolf
On "Effects of forced use on arm function in the subacute phase..." Hammer AM, Lindmark B. Phys Ther. 2009;89:526-539.
Physical Therapy, September 1, 2009; 89(9): 993 - 995.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Neurorehabil Neural RepairHome page
K.-c. Lin, Y.-f. Chang, C.-y. Wu, and Y.-a. Chen
Effects of Constraint-Induced Therapy Versus Bilateral Arm Training on Motor Performance, Daily Functions, and Quality of Life in Stroke Survivors
Neurorehabil Neural Repair, June 1, 2009; 23(5): 441 - 448.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Neurorehabil Neural RepairHome page
S. J. Housman, K. M. Scott, and D. J. Reinkensmeyer
A Randomized Controlled Trial of Gravity-Supported, Computer-Enhanced Arm Exercise for Individuals With Severe Hemiparesis
Neurorehabil Neural Repair, June 1, 2009; 23(5): 505 - 514.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Neurorehabil Neural RepairHome page
M. F. Levin, J. A. Kleim, and S. L. Wolf
What Do Motor "Recovery" and "Compensation" Mean in Patients Following Stroke?
Neurorehabil Neural Repair, May 1, 2009; 23(4): 313 - 319.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
ptjournalHome page
C. F Siengsukon and L. A Boyd
Does Sleep Promote Motor Learning? Implications for Physical Rehabilitation
Physical Therapy, April 1, 2009; 89(4): 370 - 383.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Neurorehabil Neural RepairHome page
B. H. Dobkin
Progressive Staging of Pilot Studies to Improve Phase III Trials for Motor Interventions
Neurorehabil Neural Repair, March 1, 2009; 23(3): 197 - 206.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Advertisement