| Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools. |
Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, Vol. 22, No. 3, 305-310 (2008) DOI: 10.1177/1545968307311102 © 2008 American Society of Neurorehabilitation Intensive Sensorimotor Arm Training Mediated by Therapist or Robot Improves Hemiparesis in Patients With Chronic StrokeDepartment of Neurology and Neuroscience, Burke Institute of Medical Research, Weill Medical College, Cornell University, White Plains, NY, Newman Laboratory, Mechanical Engineering Department, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, btv3{at}cornell.edu
Department of Neurology and Neuroscience, Burke Institute of Medical Research, Weill Medical College, Cornell University, White Plains, NY
Department of Neurology and Neuroscience, Burke Institute of Medical Research, Weill Medical College, Cornell University, White Plains, NY
Department of Neurology and Neuroscience, Burke Institute of Medical Research, Weill Medical College, Cornell University, White Plains, NY
Department of Neurology and Neuroscience, Burke Institute of Medical Research, Weill Medical College, Cornell University, White Plains, NY
Newman Laboratory, Mechanical Engineering Department, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Brain and Cognitive Sciences Department, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge
Department of Neurology and Neuroscience, Burke Institute of Medical Research, Weill Medical College, Cornell University, White Plains, NY, Newman Laboratory, Mechanical Engineering Department, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Department of Neurology, University of Maryland Baltimore Investigators have demonstrated that a variety of intensive movement training protocols for persistent upper limb paralysis in patients with chronic stroke (6 months or more after stroke) improve motor outcome. This randomized controlled study determined in patients with upper limb motor impairment after chronic stroke whether movement therapy delivered by a robot or by a therapist using an intensive training protocol was superior. Robotic training (n = 11) and an intensive movement protocol (n = 10) improved the impairment measures of motor outcome significantly and comparably; there were no significant changes in disability measures. Motor gains were maintained at the 3-month evaluation after training. These data contribute to the growing awareness that persistent impairments in those with chronic stroke may not reflect exhausted capacity for improvement. These new protocols, rendered by either therapist or robot, can be standardized, tested, and replicated, and potentially will contribute to rational activity-based programs.
Key Words: Stroke Recovery of function Rehabilitation.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||