|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Intensive Sensorimotor Arm Training Mediated by Therapist or Robot Improves Hemiparesis in Patients With Chronic Stroke
Bruce T. Volpe, MD
Department of Neurology and Neuroscience, Burke Institute of Medical Research, Weill Medical College, Cornell University, White Plains, NY, Newman Laboratory, Mechanical Engineering Department, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, btv3{at}cornell.edu
Daniel Lynch, OT/L
Department of Neurology and Neuroscience, Burke Institute of Medical Research, Weill Medical College, Cornell University, White Plains, NY
Avrielle Rykman-Berland, OT/L
Department of Neurology and Neuroscience, Burke Institute of Medical Research, Weill Medical College, Cornell University, White Plains, NY
Mark Ferraro, OT/L
Department of Neurology and Neuroscience, Burke Institute of Medical Research, Weill Medical College, Cornell University, White Plains, NY
Michael Galgano
Department of Neurology and Neuroscience, Burke Institute of Medical Research, Weill Medical College, Cornell University, White Plains, NY
Neville Hogan, PhD
Newman Laboratory, Mechanical Engineering Department, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Brain and Cognitive Sciences Department, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge
Hermano I. Krebs, PhD
Department of Neurology and Neuroscience, Burke Institute of Medical Research, Weill Medical College, Cornell University, White Plains, NY, Newman Laboratory, Mechanical Engineering Department, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Department of Neurology, University of Maryland Baltimore
Investigators have demonstrated that a variety of intensive movement training protocols for persistent upper limb paralysis in patients with chronic stroke (6 months or more after stroke) improve motor outcome. This randomized controlled study determined in patients with upper limb motor impairment after chronic stroke whether movement therapy delivered by a robot or by a therapist using an intensive training protocol was superior. Robotic training (n = 11) and an intensive movement protocol (n = 10) improved the impairment measures of motor outcome significantly and comparably; there were no significant changes in disability measures. Motor gains were maintained at the 3-month evaluation after training. These data contribute to the growing awareness that persistent impairments in those with chronic stroke may not reflect exhausted capacity for improvement. These new protocols, rendered by either therapist or robot, can be standardized, tested, and replicated, and potentially will contribute to rational activity-based programs.
Key Words: Stroke Recovery of function Rehabilitation.
This version was published on June
1, 2008
Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, Vol. 22, No. 3,
305-310 (2008)
DOI: 10.1177/1545968307311102

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Clarke, H. Mala, V. Windle, G. Chernenko, and D. Corbett
The Effects of Repeated Rehabilitation "Tune-Ups" on Functional Recovery After Focal Ischemia in Rats
Neurorehabil Neural Repair,
November 1, 2009;
23(9):
886 - 894.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
X. L. Hu, K.-y. Tong, R. Song, X. J. Zheng, and W. W. F. Leung
A Comparison Between Electromyography-Driven Robot and Passive Motion Device on Wrist Rehabilitation for Chronic Stroke
Neurorehabil Neural Repair,
October 1, 2009;
23(8):
837 - 846.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. C. Lo, P. Guarino, H. I. Krebs, B. T. Volpe, C. T. Bever, P. W. Duncan, R. J. Ringer, T. H. Wagner, L. G. Richards, D. M. Bravata, et al.
Multicenter Randomized Trial of Robot-Assisted Rehabilitation for Chronic Stroke: Methods and Entry Characteristics for VA ROBOTICS
Neurorehabil Neural Repair,
October 1, 2009;
23(8):
775 - 783.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Platz, S. van Kaick, J. Mehrholz, O. Leidner, C. Eickhof, and M. Pohl
Best Conventional Therapy Versus Modular Impairment-Oriented Training for Arm Paresis After Stroke: A Single-Blind, Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial
Neurorehabil Neural Repair,
September 1, 2009;
23(7):
706 - 716.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A.M. Hughes, C.T. Freeman, J.H. Burridge, P.H. Chappell, P.L. Lewin, and E. Rogers
Feasibility of Iterative Learning Control Mediated by Functional Electrical Stimulation for Reaching After Stroke
Neurorehabil Neural Repair,
July 1, 2009;
23(6):
559 - 568.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K.-c. Lin, Y.-f. Chang, C.-y. Wu, and Y.-a. Chen
Effects of Constraint-Induced Therapy Versus Bilateral Arm Training on Motor Performance, Daily Functions, and Quality of Life in Stroke Survivors
Neurorehabil Neural Repair,
June 1, 2009;
23(5):
441 - 448.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. J. Housman, K. M. Scott, and D. J. Reinkensmeyer
A Randomized Controlled Trial of Gravity-Supported, Computer-Enhanced Arm Exercise for Individuals With Severe Hemiparesis
Neurorehabil Neural Repair,
June 1, 2009;
23(5):
505 - 514.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. B. Plow, J. R. Carey, R. J. Nudo, and A. Pascual-Leone
Invasive Cortical Stimulation to Promote Recovery of Function After Stroke: A Critical Appraisal
Stroke,
May 1, 2009;
40(5):
1926 - 1931.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. H. Dobkin
Progressive Staging of Pilot Studies to Improve Phase III Trials for Motor Interventions
Neurorehabil Neural Repair,
March 1, 2009;
23(3):
197 - 206.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. R. Ratan and M. Noble
Novel Multi-Modal Strategies to Promote Brain and Spinal Cord Injury Recovery
Stroke,
March 1, 2009;
40(3_suppl_1):
S130 - S132.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Rabadi, M. Galgano, D. Lynch, M Akerman, M. Lesser, and B. Volpe
A pilot study of activity-based therapy in the arm motor recovery post stroke: a randomized controlled trial
Clinical Rehabilitation,
December 1, 2008;
22(12):
1071 - 1082.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|
|