This Article Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 1545968307307123v1 22/3/298    most recent References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Langan, J. Articles by van Donkelaar, P. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Langan, J. Articles by van Donkelaar, P. Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

The Influence of Hand Dominance on the Response to a Constraint-Induced Therapy Program Following Stroke

Department of Human Physiology, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR, jlangan{at}umich.edu

Paul van Donkelaar

Department of Human Physiology, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR

Background. Following stroke it is common to exhibit deficits in mobility of the upper extremity. Constraint-induced therapy (CIT) is a rehabilitation technique used to promote use of the more affected hand via constraint of the less affected hand. One factor that could impact the outcome following CIT is hand dominance. Years of preferred use of one hand may give individuals with the dominant hand affected by stroke an advantage in improving the mobility of the more affected hand compared to those individuals with the nondominant hand affected by stroke. In addition, the diminished use of the less affected hand during CIT may also create changes. Objective. Our goal was to better understand how hand dominance may influence the response to a CIT program both cortically and behaviorally in both the more affected hand and less affected constrained hand. Methods. A repeated measures design with a double baseline was used to assess changes in clinical tests and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) in individuals with their dominant or nondominant hand affected by stroke involved in a CIT program. Results. No significant differences were found between groups in their responses to CIT. Overall subjects demonstrated behavioral and cortical changes with the more affected hand and the less affected constrained hand did not significantly change. Conclusion. CIT promotes improvement of the more affected hand particularly on complex tests without decrements to the less affected constrained hand. Cortically, statistically significant changes in activation were noted after the intervention for the more affected hand; no changes were noted with the less affected constrained hand.

Key Words: Constraint-induced therapy • Stroke • Rehabilitation • fMRI

This version was published on June 1, 2008

Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, Vol. 22, No. 3, 298-304 (2008)
DOI: 10.1177/1545968307307123


CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				K.-c. Lin, Y.-h. Huang, Y.-w. Hsieh, and C.-y. Wu Potential Predictors of Motor and Functional Outcomes After Distributed Constraint-Induced Therapy for Patients With Stroke Neurorehabil Neural Repair, May 1, 2009; 23(4): 336 - 342. [Abstract] [PDF]