This Article Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 1545968307306239v1 22/2/122    most recent References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Google Scholar Articles by Donovan, N. J. Articles by Duncan, P. W. PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Donovan, N. J. Articles by Duncan, P. W. Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Conceptualizing Functional Cognition in Stroke

VA HSR&D/RR&D Rehabilitation Outcomes Research Center, neilad{at}phhp.ufl.edu

Diane L. Kendall, PhD

VA RR&D Brain Rehabilitation Research Center, University of Florida Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders

Shelley C. Heaton, PhD

Clinical and Health Psychology

Sooyeon Kwon, PhD

Pharmacy Healthcare Administration

Craig A. Velozo, PhD

VA HSR&D/RR&D Rehabilitation Outcomes Research Center, Occupational Therapy

Pamela W. Duncan, PhD

VA HSR&D/RR&D Rehabilitation Outcomes Research Center, Institute on Aging, Gainesville, FL

Background. Up to 65% of individuals demonstrate poststroke cognitive impairments, which may increase hospital stay and caregiver burden. Randomized stroke clinical trials have emphasized physical recovery over cognition. Neuropsychological assessments have had limited utility in randomized clinical trials. These issues accentuate the need for a measure of functional cognition (the ability to accomplish everyday activities that rely on cognitive abilities, such as locating keys, conveying information, or planning activities). Objective. The aim of the study was to present the process used to establish domains of functional cognition for development of computer adaptive measure of functional cognition for stroke. Methods. Functional cognitive domains involved in identifying relevant neuropsychological constructs from the literature were conceptualized and finalized after advisory panel feedback from experts in neurology, neuropsychology, aphasiology, clinical trials, and epidemiology. Results. The following 17 domains were proposed: receptive aphasia, expressive aphasia, agraphia, alexia, calculation, visuospatial, visuoperceptual, visuoconstruction, attention, language usage, executive functions, orientation, processing speed, memory, working memory, mood, awareness and abstract reasoning. The advisory panel recommended retaining the first 12 domains. Recommended changes included: to address only encoding and retrieval of recent information in the memory domain; to add domains for limb apraxia and poststroke depression; and to keep orientation as a separate domain or reclassify it under memory or attention. The final 10 domains included: language, reading and writing, numeric/calculation, limb praxis, visuospatial function, social use of language, emotional function, attention, executive function, and memory. Conclusion. Conceptualizing domains of functional cognition is the first step in developing a computer adaptive measure of functional cognition for stroke. Additional steps include developing, refining, and field-testing items, psychometric analysis, and computer adaptive test programming.

Key Words: Cerebrovascular accident • Cognition • Cognition disorders • Outcomes research • Stroke.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. Boustani and M. D. Justiss Subtle Neurological Abnormalities and Functional Cognition in Older Adults Arch Intern Med, June 23, 2008; 168(12): 1252 - 1253. [Full Text] [PDF]