SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair
This Article
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
1545968306298412v1
21/6/561    most recent
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chae, J.
Right arrow Articles by Fang, Z.-P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chae, J.
Right arrow Articles by Fang, Z.-P.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
Medline Plus Health Information
*Joint Disorders
*Stroke
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Intramuscular Electrical Stimulation for Shoulder Pain in Hemiplegia: Does Time From Stroke Onset Predict Treatment Success?

John Chae, MD

Cleveland Functional Electrical Stimulation Center Cleveland, Ohio, Departments of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Biomedical Engineering Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, jchae{at}metrohealth.org

Alan Ng, MD

Departments of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

David T. Yu, MD

Cleveland Functional Electrical Stimulation Center Cleveland, Ohio, Departments of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

Andrew Kirsteins, MD

Charlotte Institute for Rehabilitation Charlotte, North Carolina

Elie P. Elovic, MD

Kessler Medical Rehabilitation Research and Education Corporation West Orange, New Jersey

Steven R. Flanagan, MD

Department of Rehabilitation Medicine Mt Sinai School of Medicine, New York

Richard L. Harvey, MD

Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago Chicago, Illinois

Richard D. Zorowitz, MD

Department of Rehabilitation Medicine University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia

Zi-Ping Fang, PhD

NeuroControl Corporation North Ridgeville, Ohio

Background. A randomized clinical has shown the effectiveness of intramuscular electrical stimulation for the treatment of poststroke shoulder pain. Objective. Identify predictors of treatment success and assess the impact of the strongest predictor on outcomes. Method. This is a secondary analysis of a multisite randomized clinical trial of intramuscular electrical stimulation for poststroke shoulder pain. The study included 61 chronic stroke survivors with shoulder pain randomized to a 6-week course of intramuscular electrical stimulation (n = 32) versus a hemisling (n = 29). The primary outcome measure was Brief Pain Inventory Question 12. Treatment success was defined as ≥ 2-point reduction in this measure at end of treatment and at 3, 6, and 12 months posttreatment. Forward stepwise regression was used to identify factors predictive of treatment success among participants assigned to the electrical stimulation group. The factor most predictive of treatment success was used as an explanatory variable, and the clinical trials data were reanalyzed. Results. Time from stroke onset was most predictive of treatment success. Subjects were divided according to the median value of stroke onset: early (<77 weeks) versus late (> 77 weeks). Electrical stimulation was effective in reducing poststroke shoulder pain for the early group (94% vs 7%, P < .001) but not for the late group (31% vs 33%). Repeated-measure analysis of variance revealed significant treatment (P < .001), time from stroke onset (P = .032), and treatment by time from stroke onset interaction (P < .001) effects. Conclusions. Stroke survivors who are treated early after stroke onset may experience greater benefit from intramuscular electrical stimulation for poststroke shoulder pain. However, the relative importance of time from stroke onset versus duration of pain is not known.

Key Words: Poststroke shoulder pain • Electrical stimulation

This version was published on December 1, 2007

Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, Vol. 21, No. 6, 561-567 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/1545968306298412


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Neurorehabil Neural RepairHome page
S. Mangold, C. Schuster, T. Keller, A. Zimmermann-Schlatter, and T. Ettlin
Motor Training of Upper Extremity With Functional Electrical Stimulation in Early Stroke Rehabilitation
Neurorehabil Neural Repair, February 1, 2009; 23(2): 184 - 190.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Advertisement