Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to browse AJSM online!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
1545968307301880v1
21/6/539    most recent
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ditunno, J. F.
Right arrow Articles by Chung, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ditunno, J. F., Jr
Right arrow Articles by Chung, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
This version was published on December 1, 2007
Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, Vol. 21, No. 6, 539-550 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/1545968307301880

Validity of the Walking Scale for Spinal Cord Injury and Other Domains of Function in a Multicenter Clinical Trial

John F. Ditunno, Jr, MD

Spinal Cord Injury Locomotor Trial (SCILT) Group, John.Ditunno{at}jefferson.edu

Hugues Barbeau, PhD

Spinal Cord Injury Locomotor Trial (SCILT) Group

Bruce H. Dobkin, MD

Spinal Cord Injury Locomotor Trial (SCILT) Group

Robert Elashoff, PhD

Spinal Cord Injury Locomotor Trial (SCILT) Group

Susan Harkema, PhD

Spinal Cord Injury Locomotor Trial (SCILT) Group

Ralph J. Marino, MD

Spinal Cord Injury Locomotor Trial (SCILT) Group

Walter W. Hauck, PhD

Spinal Cord Injury Locomotor Trial (SCILT) Group

David Apple, MD

Spinal Cord Injury Locomotor Trial (SCILT) Group

D. Michele Basso, EdD

Spinal Cord Injury Locomotor Trial (SCILT) Group

Andrea Behrman, PhD

Spinal Cord Injury Locomotor Trial (SCILT) Group

Daniel Deforge, MD

Spinal Cord Injury Locomotor Trial (SCILT) Group

Lisa Fugate, MD

Spinal Cord Injury Locomotor Trial (SCILT) Group

Michael Saulino, MD

Spinal Cord Injury Locomotor Trial (SCILT) Group

Michael Scott, MD

Spinal Cord Injury Locomotor Trial (SCILT) Group

Joanie Chung, MPH

Spinal Cord Injury Locomotor Trial (SCILT) Group

Objective. To demonstrate criterion (concurrent and predictive) and construct validity of the Walking Index for Spinal Cord Injury (WISCI) scale and other walking measures in the Spinal Cord Injury Locomotor Trial (SCILT). Design. Prospective multicenter clinical trial of a walking intervention for patients with acute traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI). Participants/Methods. Body weight–supported treadmill training was compared to overground mobility training in 146 patients with incomplete SCI (C4 to L3) enrolled within 8 weeks of onset and treated for 12 weeks. Primary outcome measures were the Functional Independence Measure (FIM), 50-foot walking speed (50FW-S), and 6-minute walking distance (6MW-D), tested 3, 6, and 12 months after entry. Secondary measures were the Lower Extremity Motor Score (LEMS), Berg Balance Scale (BBS), WISCI, and FIM locomotor score (LFIM), assessed at 6 centers by blinded observers. Data for the 2 arms were combined since no significant differences in outcomes had been found. Results. Correlations with WISCI at 6 months were significant with BBS (r = .90), LEMS (r = .85), LFIM (r = .89), FIM (r = .77), 50FW-S (r = .85), and 6MW-D ( r = .79); similar correlations occurred at 3 and 12 months. Correlations of change scores from baseline WISCI were significant for change scores from baseline of LEMS/BBS/LFIM. Correlation of baseline LEMS and WISCI at 12 months were most significant (r = .73). The R2 of baseline LEMS explained 57% of variability of WISCI levels at 3 months. Conclusion. Concurrent validity of the WISCI scale was supported by significant correlations with all measures at 3, 6, and 12 months. Correlation of change scores supports predictive validity. The LEMS at baseline was the best predictor of the WISCI score at 12 months and explained most of the variance, which supported both predictive and construct validity. The combination of the LEMS, BBS, WISCI, 50FW-S, and LFIM appears to encompass adequate descriptors for outcomes of walking trials for incomplete SCI.

Key Words: Spinal cord injuries • Ambulation • Outcome assessment • Validity


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?