This Article Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free All Versions of this Article: 1545968306298414v1 21/5/398    most recent References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Cirstea, M.C. Articles by Levin, M.F. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Cirstea, M.C. Articles by Levin, M.F. Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Improvement of Arm Movement Patterns and Endpoint Control Depends on Type of Feedback During Practice in Stroke Survivors

Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada

M.F. Levin, PhD

School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, mindy.levin{at}mcgill.ca, Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation, Montreal, Quebec

Background. A major challenge in stroke rehabilitation is restoration of arm motor function. Therapy-induced improvements in arm function may occur via restoration of premorbid movement patterns (recovery) or development of compensatory movement strategies. However, it is unclear whether the learning benefits of practice might be enhanced by incorporating different forms of feedback, focusing on movement outcomes or on specific arm movement patterns. Objective. To determine if manipulation of attentional focus by providing either knowledge of results (KR) feedback, focusing on movement outcomes, or knowledge of performance (KP) feedback, focusing on arm movement patterns during repetitive practice of a pointing movement, may lead to arm motor recovery. Methods. Twenty-eight chronic stroke survivors were randomly assigned to 2 groups that practiced 10 sessions of 75 pointing movements. During practice, groups received either 20% KR about movement precision or faded (26.6% average) KP about arm joint movements. A nondisabled control group (n = 5) practiced the same task with KR. Results. Motor patterns recovered only in KP, as evidenced by immediate and long-term increases in joint range, better interjoint coordination in early movement phases, and generalization of gains. Improvements in clinical impairment and function were related to decreases in compensation (trunk rotation) and recovery of interjoint coordination in mid-movement phases. Conclusions. In stroke survivors, when the learners' attention was directed to the movements themselves (KP), motor improvements reflect recovery compared to when attention was directed toward movement outcomes (KR).

Key Words: Stroke • Arm paresis • Motor recovery • Compensation • Knowledge of results • Knowledge of performance.

This version was published on October 1, 2007

Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, Vol. 21, No. 5, 398-411 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/1545968306298414


CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. L. Woodbury, D. R. Howland, T. E. McGuirk, S. B. Davis, C. R. Senesac, S. Kautz, and L. G. Richards Effects of Trunk Restraint Combined With Intensive Task Practice on Poststroke Upper Extremity Reach and Function: A Pilot Study Neurorehabil Neural Repair, January 1, 2009; 23(1): 78 - 91. [Abstract] [PDF]

				I. Eisner-Janowicz, S. Barbay, E. Hoover, A. M. Stowe, S. B. Frost, E. J. Plautz, and R. J. Nudo Early and Late Changes in the Distal Forelimb Representation of the Supplementary Motor Area After Injury to Frontal Motor Areas in the Squirrel Monkey J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2008; 100(3): 1498 - 1512. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. Broetz, S. R Soekadar, and N. Birbaumer On "A four-week, task-specific neuroprosthesis program..." Dunning K, et al. Phys Ther. 2008;88:397-405. Physical Therapy, August 1, 2008; 88(8): 970 - 970. [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. D. Takahashi, L. Der-Yeghiaian, V. Le, R. R. Motiwala, and S. C. Cramer Robot-based hand motor therapy after stroke Brain, February 1, 2008; 131(2): 425 - 437. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]