This Article Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free All Versions of this Article: 1545968307300697v1 21/4/307    most recent References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (13) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Mayr, A. Articles by Saltuari, L. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Mayr, A. Articles by Saltuari, L. Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Prospective, Blinded, Randomized Crossover Study of Gait Rehabilitation in Stroke Patients Using the Lokomat Gait Orthosis

Department ofNeurology, Hospital Hochzirl, Zirl, Austria

Markus Kofler, MD

Department ofNeurology, Hospital Hochzirl, Zirl, Austria, markus.kofler{at}i-med.ac.at

Ellen Quirbach, PT

Department ofNeurology, Hospital Hochzirl, Zirl, Austria

Heinz Matzak, MD

Department ofNeurology, Hospital Hochzirl, Zirl, Austria

Katrin Fröhlich, MD

Department ofNeurology, Hospital Hochzirl, Zirl, Austria

Leopold Saltuari, MD

Department ofNeurology, Hospital Hochzirl, Zirl, Austria

Objective. Treadmill training with partial body weight support has been suggested as a useful strategy for gait rehabilitation after stroke. This prospective, blinded, randomized controlled study of gait retraining tested the feasibility and potential efficacy of using an electromechanical-driven gait orthosis (Lokomat) for treadmill training. Methods. Sixteen stroke patients, mostly within 3 months after onset, were randomized into 2 treatment groups, ABA or BAB (A = 3 weeks of Lokomat training, B = 3 weeks of conventional physical therapy) for 9 weeks of treatment. The outcome measures were the EU-Walking Scale, Rivermead Motor Assessment Scale, 10-m timed walking speed, 6-minute timed walking distance, Motricity Index, Medical Research Council Scale of strength, and Ashworth Scale of tone. Results. The EU-Walking Scale, Rivermead Motor Assessment Scale, 6-minute timed walking distance, Medical Research Council Scale, and Ashworth Scale demonstrated significantly more improvement during the Lokomat training phase than during the conventional physical therapy phase within each 3-week interval. Conclusions. Despite the small number of patients, the present data suggest that the Lokomat robotic assistive device provides innovative possibilities for gait training in stroke rehabilitation while eliminating prolonged repetitive movements in a nonergonomic position on the part of the physical therapist.

Key Words: Locomotion • Stroke • Assessment scores • Automated gait orthosis • Lokomat.

This version was published on July 1, 2007

Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, Vol. 21, No. 4, 307-314 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/1545968307300697


CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				B. H. Dobkin Progressive Staging of Pilot Studies to Improve Phase III Trials for Motor Interventions Neurorehabil Neural Repair, March 1, 2009; 23(3): 197 - 206. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. U. Blicher and J. F. Nielsen Cortical and Spinal Excitability Changes After Robotic Gait Training in Healthy Participants Neurorehabil Neural Repair, February 1, 2009; 23(2): 143 - 149. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. Hidler, D. Nichols, M. Pelliccio, K. Brady, D. D. Campbell, J. H. Kahn, and T. G. Hornby Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial Evaluating the Effectiveness of the Lokomat in Subacute Stroke Neurorehabil Neural Repair, January 1, 2009; 23(1): 5 - 13. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Kofler, E. Quirbach, R. Schauer, M. Singer, and L. Saltuari Limitations of Intrathecal Baclofen for Spastic Hemiparesis Following Stroke Neurorehabil Neural Repair, January 1, 2009; 23(1): 26 - 31. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. Dickstein Rehabilitation of Gait Speed After Stroke: A Critical Review of Intervention Approaches Neurorehabil Neural Repair, November 1, 2008; 22(6): 649 - 660. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. C. Lo and E. W. Triche Improving Gait in Multiple Sclerosis Using Robot-Assisted, Body Weight Supported Treadmill Training Neurorehabil Neural Repair, November 1, 2008; 22(6): 661 - 671. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. Banz, M. Bolliger, G. Colombo, V. Dietz, and L. Lunenburger Computerized Visual Feedback: An Adjunct to Robotic-Assisted Gait Training Physical Therapy, October 1, 2008; 88(10): 1135 - 1145. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Lam, M. Wirz, L. Lunenburger, and V. Dietz Swing Phase Resistance Enhances Flexor Muscle Activity During Treadmill Locomotion in Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury Neurorehabil Neural Repair, September 1, 2008; 22(5): 438 - 446. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J.-P. Regnaux, K. Saremi, J. Marehbian, B. Bussel, and B. H. Dobkin An Accelerometry-Based Comparison of 2 Robotic Assistive Devices for Treadmill Training of Gait Neurorehabil Neural Repair, July 1, 2008; 22(4): 348 - 354. [Abstract] [PDF]

				T. G. Hornby, D. D. Campbell, J. H. Kahn, T. Demott, J. L. Moore, and H. R. Roth Enhanced Gait-Related Improvements After Therapist- Versus Robotic-Assisted Locomotor Training in Subjects With Chronic Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Study Stroke, June 1, 2008; 39(6): 1786 - 1792. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]