This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Ewert, T. Articles by Stucki, G. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Ewert, T. Articles by Stucki, G. Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Validity of the SS-QOL in Germany and in Survivors of Hemorrhagic or Ischemic Stroke

Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany

Gerold Stucki, MD, MS

Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany, Swiss Paraplegic Research Centre (SPF), Nottwil, Switzerland, gerold.stucki{at}med.uni-muenchen.de

Objective. The Stroke-Specific Quality of Life Scale (SS-QOL) is a recently developed measure to assess health-related quality of life in stroke patients. The objective of this study was to translate the American version of the SS-QOL and examine the validity of the German proxy version, in both ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke survivors.

Methods. The translation was conducted according to published guidelines. The validation was performed in consecutive adult stroke survivors. Data were obtained 1 year after discharge. To examine the dimensionality of the SS-QOL, factor analyses were conducted. The validity was examined by the associations of the subscales with the Functional Independence Measure and Short Form 36.

Results. The literal translation revealed no major changes between the American and the German versions of the SS-QOL. Three hundred seven stroke survivors were included in the study. Unlike the 1st validation study, most of the variance could be explained by 8 instead of 12 factors; therefore, the 8-factor solution was further examined. The validity of the SS-QOL total score and "observable" scales such as "activities" was shown.

Conclusions. For the German proxy version of the SS-QOL, an 8-factor solution was found to be the most appropriate. The psychometric properties of these 8 subscales were good or excellent with respect to internal consistency. The validity of the total score was shown, but some subscales (energy, mood, and thinking) failed the hypothesized associations. Therefore, the SS-QOL needs to be further explored in other settings and populations.

Key Words: Stroke • Validation • Health-related quality of life • Rehabilitation

Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, Vol. 21, No. 2, 161-168 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/1545968306292255


CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?