This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (7) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Dobkin, B. H. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Dobkin, B. H. Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Confounders in Rehabilitation Trials of Task-Oriented Training: Lessons From the Designs of the EXCITE and SCILT Multicenter Trials

Department of Neurology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, bdobkin{at}mednet.ucla.edu

Two multicenter randomized clinical trials (MRCT), the Extremity Constraint Induced Therapy Evaluation (EXCITE) to improve upper extremity function after stroke and the Spinal Cord Injury Locomotor Trial (SCILT) to enable functional walking after incomplete spinal cord injury, demonstrate that complex, task-oriented physical therapies can be studied using a scientific methodology during inpatient or outpatient rehabilitation. In the past, a new therapy’s benefit may have been overestimated by comparing it to no treatment or to a conventional treatment at a low intensity of practice. Sample sizes were often too small and may have failed to detect the efficacy of a new intervention. In addition, whereas statistical significance in outcomes has been critical to understanding whether one treatment is better than another, the clinical significance of outcomes must also impact the interpretation of the results of a trial. MRCT designs will continue to improve through attention to the limitations of preclinical animal models that offer a conceptual basis for the treatment, from enrichment strategies at every phase of trial development, from more vigorous dose-response studies using adaptive methods, by capturing interim measures of behavior and functional neurophysiologic adaptations during the treatment phase, by aiming for a clinically meaningful control intervention, and by including ratio or interval outcome measures when feasible that capture a target of the intervention in relation to gains in daily functioning and quality of life.

Key Words: Rehabilitation • Stroke • Spinal cord injury • Randomized clinical trials • Treadmill training • Constraint induced movement therapy • Hemiplegia • Paraplegia • fMRI

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				B. H. Dobkin Fatigue Versus Activity-Dependent Fatigability in Patients With Central or Peripheral Motor Impairments Neurorehabil Neural Repair, April 1, 2008; 22(2): 105 - 110. [Abstract] [PDF]

				G. F. Wittenberg, E. P. Bastings, A. M. Fowlkes, T. M. Morgan, D. C. Good, and T. P. Pons Dynamic Course of Intracortical TMS Paired-Pulse Responses During Recovery of Motor Function After Stroke Neurorehabil Neural Repair, December 1, 2007; 21(6): 568 - 573. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. L. Wolf, C. J. Winstein, J. P. Miller, S. Blanton, P. C. Clark, and D. Nichols-Larsen Looking in the Rear View Mirror When Conversing With Back Seat Drivers: The EXCITE Trial Revisited Neurorehabil Neural Repair, October 1, 2007; 21(5): 379 - 387. [Abstract] [PDF]

				T. Brandt Motor and Functional Recovery After Stroke: A Comparison Between 4 European Rehabilitation Centers Stroke, July 1, 2007; 38(7): 2030 - 2031. [Full Text] [PDF]