Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (6)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Boake, C.
Right arrow Articles by Levin, H. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Boake, C.
Right arrow Articles by Levin, H. S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, Vol. 21, No. 1, 14-24 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/1545968306291858

Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy During Early Stroke Rehabilitation

Corwin Boake, PhD

Departments of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Baylor College of Medicine/University of Texas-Houston Medical School, Houston, TX, corwin.boake{at}uth.tmc.edu

Elizabeth A. Noser, MD

Department of Neurology Stroke Program, University of Texas-Houston Medical School, Houston, TX

Tony Ro, PhD

Department of Psychology, Rice University, Houston, TX

Sarah Baraniuk, PhD

University of Texas-Houston School of Public Health, Houston, TX

Mary Gaber, OTR

Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Memorial Hermann Hospital, Houston, TX

Ruth Johnson, MA

Department of Psychology, Rice University, Houston, TX

Eva T. Salmeron, MD

Departments of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Baylor College of Medicine/University of Texas-Houston Medical School, Houston, TX

Thao M. Tran, MD

Departments of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Baylor College of Medicine/University of Texas-Houston Medical School, Houston, TX

Jenny M. Lai, MD

Departments of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Baylor College of Medicine/University of Texas-Houston Medical School, Houston, TX

Edward Taub, PhD

Department of Psychology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL

Lemuel A. Moye, PhD

University of Texas-Houston School of Public Health, Houston, TX

James C. Grotta, MD

Department of Neurology Stroke Program, University of Texas-Houston Medical School, Houston, TX

Harvey S. Levin, PhD

Departments of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Baylor College of Medicine/University of Texas-Houston Medical School, Houston, TX

Background. Limited data are available about the effectiveness of early rehabilitation after stroke.

Objective. This is the 1st randomized controlled trial of constraint-induced movement therapy (CIMT) in subacute stroke to investigate neurophysiologic mechanisms and long-term outcome.

Methods. Within 2 weeks after stroke, 23 patients with upper extremity (UE) weakness were randomized to 2 weeks of CIMT or traditional therapy at an equal frequency of up to 3 h/day. Motor function of the affected UE was blindly assessed before treatment, after treatment, and 3 months after stroke. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) measured the cortical area evoking movement of the affected hand.

Results. Long-term improvement in motor function of the affected UE did not differ significantly between patients who received CIMT versus intensive traditional therapy. All outcome comparisons showed trends favoring CIMT over intensive traditional therapy, but none was statistically significant except for improvements in the Fugl-Meyer (FM) UE motor scale immediately following treatment and in reported quality of hand function at 3 months. Improvement in UE motor function on the FM was associated with a greater number of sites on the affected cerebral hemisphere where responses of the affected hand were evoked by TMS.

Conclusions. Future trials of CIMT during early stroke rehabilitation need greater statistical power, more inclusive eligibility criteria, and improved experimental control over treatment intensity. The relationship between changes in motor function and in evoked motor responses suggests that motor recovery during the 1st 3 months after stroke is associated with increased motor excitability of the affected cerebral hemisphere.

Key Words: Stroke • Cerebrovascular disorders • Hemiplegia • Randomized controlled trial • Rehabilitation • Transcranial magnetic stimulation


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
A. Dahl, T. Askim, R. Stock, E. Langorgen, S. Lydersen, and B. Indredavik
Short- and long-term outcome of constraint-induced movement therapy after stroke: a randomized controlled feasibility trial
Clinical Rehabilitation, May 1, 2008; 22(5): 436 - 447.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Neurorehabil Neural RepairHome page
B. H. Dobkin
Confounders in Rehabilitation Trials of Task-Oriented Training: Lessons From the Designs of the EXCITE and SCILT Multicenter Trials
Neurorehabil Neural Repair, January 1, 2007; 21(1): 3 - 13.
[Abstract] [PDF]